VadeLab

Agreement Reached to Modify Development Consent Conditions After Conciliation Conference

Land and Environment Court (NSW)

This page reproduces the official decision. It is published for readers who need the full text and is deliberately excluded from search engines.This decision was issued by the Land and Environment Court (NSW) and is reproduced from NSW Caselaw (Β© State of New South Wales) under its published republication policy. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.View on the official source β†—

πŸ“œ Headnote Official document

In a conciliation conference, the parties agreed to modify conditions of development consent, leading to orders reflecting their agreement.

πŸ“š Full judgment Official document

Land and [ADDRESS] South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: [COMPANY] v Pittwater Council [2015] NSWLEC 1320 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 3 August 2015 Date of orders: 03 August 2015 Decision date: 03 August 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: [NAME] Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: APPEAL – Development consent – modification of s94 Conditions: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: [COMPANY] (Applicant) Pittwater Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: [redacted] [NAME] (Respondent)

Solicitors: [redacted] [NAME] (Respondent) File Number(s): 10407 of 2015

Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. [ADDRESS] also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders. ……………. [NAME] Commissioner of the Court 10407 of 2015 [NAME] (s34O) (7.11 KB, pdf) 10407 of 2015 [NAME] (C) (140 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 11 August 2015

Agreement Reached to Modify Development Consent Conditions After Conciliation Conference β€” full judgment | VadeLab