
Administrative judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
A person seeking to extend the time to appeal against a visa cancellation decision had their case dismissed because they did not appear in court as required. The judge ruled that the claimant's absence justified dismissing the application for an extension of time.
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal upheld the revocation of a man's firearms licence because he was convicted of intimidating someone and failed to secure his firearms properly. The court emphasised the importance of public safety and compliance with strict regulations on firearms possession.
The Australian Competition Tribunal dismissed an application for leave to a person a a person by the a person Regulation Authority of Western Australia (ERA) concerning the a person. The applicants challenged two aspects: return on equity and imputation credits, but the Tribunal found no reviewable error in the ERA's determination.
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal dismissed an appeal challenging the Commissioner's decision on access to government information. The Tribunal ruled that the Commissioner did not hold any additional relevant information at the time of the initial decision.
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal dismissed an application for leave to appeal an interlocutory decision and ordered the applicant to pay the respondents' costs. The Tribunal found that the usual rule applies and that special circumstances were not demonstrated.
The Federal Court granted an urgent order to transfer a minor and his mother from Nauru to Australia for psychiatric care. The court found that the Commonwealth owed a duty of care to the minor due to his dependency on the Commonwealth for survival and sustenance.
In this case, the court reviewed a decision made by the Workers Compensation Commission regarding the assessment of permanent impairment for a worker. The court found that the appeal panel failed to identify a real error in the medical assessment certificate and ordered the matter to be remitted to the Commission for reconsideration.
In this case, the Federal Court considered whether a decision made by a land council complied with certain procedural requirements set out in a person a person. The court found that while some aspects of the claim were successful, others were not.
A person wanted to move their liquor licence from one place to another store. They argued that selling alcohol in packages at the supermarket wouldn't harm the community. The court agreed and allowed the transfer with certain conditions.
The court denied a taxpayer's request for an interlocutory injunction to stop a notice requiring security for future tax liabilities. The court considered the taxpayer's history of non-compliance with tax obligations.
The Supreme Court of New South Wales denied a man's request to appeal a decision made by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales (NCAT). The NCAT had appointed a guardian and financial manager for the man, and the Supreme Court upheld this decision.
In this case, the Supreme Court of New South Wales reviewed decisions made by the Workers Compensation Commission and found that they were made in error. The court declared the decisions invalid and ordered them to be reconsidered by the appropriate authority.