
Criminal judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the sentence for a home invasion involving firearms. The court emphasised the need for procedural fairness when considering general deterrence in sentencing.
The Supreme Court of New South Wales ordered psychiatric evaluations and interim supervision for a defendant previously convicted of murder. The court ruled that the defendant must undergo psychiatric assessments and comply with interim supervision conditions pending a final hearing.
In a murder case, the Supreme Court of New South Wales directed a verdict of not guilty because the prosecution failed to provide enough evidence to prove the charges. The court concluded that the evidence presented was insufficient to establish the elements of murder or aggravated sexual assault.
The court convicted a man of murdering his partner and sentenced him to over 23 years in prison. The court considered that the man was heavily intoxicated at the time of the murder, which took place in their shared home.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging contempt charges and privilege claims, affirming the lower court's rulings on freezing orders and legal privilege. The case involved a party accused of contempt for breaching freezing orders and a claim for privilege over certain documents.
The Supreme Court of NSW granted an application for an inquiry into sentence due to potential errors in the original sentencing process. The claimant argued that undue weight was given to the standard non-parole period, leading to an inappropriate sentence.
The Court of Criminal Appeal overturned a directed acquittal because the original trial judge made significant errors in applying the law and considering the prosecution's case. The appeal judges found that the trial judge failed to follow proper procedures and misinterpreted the evidence presented during the trial.
The claimant was found guilty of multiple assaults and manslaughter. The court sentenced the claimant to a term of imprisonment, with a non-parole period of four years specifically for the manslaughter offense.
In a criminal case, the court determined that certain facts presented by a single witness were not essential to the prosecution's case against the accused. This decision was based on the idea that even without these specific facts, there was enough evidence to present a case to the jury.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant's application for leave to appeal because the claimant failed to obtain a certificate from the Claims Assessment and Resolution Service, as required by law.
The court allowed the examination of people related to the defendant under a restraining order, as per the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. This decision was made in a criminal proceeding involving suspected illegal activities.
A person claimed they were wrongfully imprisoned after being arrested by police during a drug investigation. The court found the arrest was lawful and dismissed the claim.