
Criminal judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Court of Criminal Appeal denied an out-of-time application for leave to appeal against the severity of sentence in a murder case, emphasising the importance of timely filings and the public interest in avoiding delays.
The court sentenced the defendant to prison for possessing and using a prohibited firearm. The court considered the severity of the offenses and the defendant's past criminal behavior.
Two individuals were sentenced to prison for cultivating cannabis using advanced methods. The court highlighted the harmful effects of cannabis and the importance of imposing strict penalties for such offenses.
The Court of Criminal Appeal allowed an appeal and adjusted sentences to consider totality principles for multiple offences committed over a period of time, ensuring fair and consistent sentencing.
The District Court of New South Wales convicted an individual for dealing with the proceeds of crime recklessly and imposed a suspended sentence of imprisonment for 12 months. The court considered various factors including the plea of guilty and the offender's good behavior during the trial period.
This judgment concerns offences related to human trafficking and slavery in the sex industry. The offenders were found guilty of intentionally possessing and using slaves, leading to substantial prison sentences and non-parole periods.
The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal upheld the sentence for the murder of a child, stressing the importance of general deterrence and the severity of the crime.
The Land and Environment Court denied the appellant's request for leave to appeal against conviction due to statutory time limits but allowed him to submit fresh evidence within two weeks. The appellant wanted to challenge his conviction and sentence in two separate cases involving different offences on the same land. However, the Court found that the statutory time limits had passed, preventing the appellant from appealing against his conviction.
The Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the sentence imposed for a robbery with a dangerous weapon. The sentencing judge was found to have properly assessed the objective seriousness of the offence and the sentence was deemed appropriate.