
Criminal judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging sentences for manslaughter and armed robbery. The court affirmed the sentences, considering the appellant's mental health and the totality principle.
The Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the sentences for malicious wounding and aggravated robbery. The court emphasised the importance of balancing sentencing goals and allowing judges to exercise discretion.
The appeal against conviction was allowed because the trial judge did not follow the proper procedure for jury deliberation as outlined in section 55F(2) of the [NAME] Act. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that the jury has deliberated for a reasonable amount of time, taking into account the complexity of the case.
In this case, the Court of Criminal Appeal dismissed an appeal against a sentence for aggravated assault with intent to rob. The court found that the sentencing judge did not make a mistake when initially considering a different sentence and then changing it.
The NSW Court of Criminal Appeal quashed a sentence for manifest inadequacy, emphasising errors in assessing the seriousness of the offence and overlooking important factors that should have increased the sentence.
The Court of Criminal Appeal adjusted the sentences for a person convicted of multiple armed robbery offences. The adjustments were made to better reflect the total criminal conduct involved.
In this case, the court determined that publishing and broadcasting the name of a child who testified in criminal proceedings contravened the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, highlighting the importance of protecting children from public exposure and potential humiliation.
In this case, the court sentenced an individual for drug and firearm offences. The court considered the severity of the crimes and the potential for rehabilitation when determining the sentence.
A medical practitioner who was convicted of possessing child pornography was prohibited from treating minors under 18 without a chaperone, according to the NSW Court of Appeal. This decision ensures the safety of minors and reflects the serious nature of the practitioner's misconduct.
In this case, the Court allowed the appeal against sentence on Count 3 but dismissed the appeal on Count 2. The Court ensured the combined effect of sentences conformed with the statutory ratio under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
In this case, the defendant was found guilty of manslaughter after using excessive force in self-defense, leading to the death of another person. The court took into account the circumstances and imposed a sentence reflecting the seriousness of the act.