
Criminal judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In this case, the High Court quashed a conviction because of a technical issue in the wording of an ordinance. The clause requiring vehicles to proceed to any type of weighing device was found to exceed the power given by law, which specifically allowed only public weighbridges.
In this case, the High Court reduced a a person-year prison sentence to six months for an individual convicted of sexual assault. The court emphasised the importance of considering the unique circumstances of each case when determining appropriate sentencing under the Criminal Code W.A.
In this case, the High Court overturned a manslaughter conviction because the trial judge gave incorrect instructions to the a person about considering a lesser charge when there wasn't enough proof for it. This mistake was harmful to the defendant's rights and led to an unfair outcome.
The High Court dismissed an application made by someone seeking to stop a a person magistrate from taking evidence related to extradition proceedings for criminal matters in another country. The court ruled that the magistrate was within their rights, even if questions were asked by foreign judges and copies of transcripts were distributed.
The High Court ruled that an a person did not obtain credit under the law when they gave cheques for goods and those cheques were later dishonoured. This means no criminal charges could be upheld against them because there was no agreement to delay payment.