
Criminal judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Court of Criminal Appeal allowed an appeal against sentence, finding the original sentence was too harsh due to procedural fairness issues and incorrect assessment of the offence's seriousness.
The NSW Supreme Court granted an extended supervision order for five years for a high-risk offender under the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006, ensuring the safety of the community.
The Court of Criminal Appeal reduced the sentence for fraud from 6 years to 4 years and 6 months, considering the utilitarian value of the plea of guilty. The applicant had obtained $515,905 by falsely claiming to have a compensation claim against a company related to asbestos exposure.
The defendant was sentenced to 9 years 7 months in prison with a non-parole period of 5 years 9 months for conspiracy to import large amounts of illegal drugs. The court took into account the totality of the crimes and the value of the guilty plea.
The court sentenced the defendant for conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of pseudoephedrine. The sentence was influenced by the defendant's guilty plea and their role in the conspiracy.
The NSW Supreme Court dismissed a claimant's request for legal professional privilege over seized documents and electronic devices. The court found that the claimant did not provide enough evidence to prove their claim.
The Supreme Court of New South Wales ordered an extended supervision order for a high-risk offender, ensuring they remain under supervision for two years due to the risk they pose to the community.
In a criminal case, the court allowed the use of a video-recorded statement from a witness who was unavailable because they had traveled abroad. The court ruled that the statement met the criteria under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
The Supreme Court of New South Wales allowed an accused person to visit the location where a murder allegedly happened in prison. This was done to help the jury better understand the evidence presented during the trial.