VadeLab

Employment

Employment judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·09 Feb 2016

Supreme Court Rejects Employer's Attempt to Restrict Former Employee

The Supreme Court of New South Wales ruled against an employer's request to stop a former employee from working for a competitor. The court determined that the restrictions violated public policy and were therefore invalid.

AllowedIndustrial Relations Commission (NSW)·03 Nov 2015

Successful completion of Flyover Project under enterprise agreement

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·08 Oct 2015

Supreme Court Upholds Local Court Ruling on Binding Employment Agreement

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·18 Sept 2015

Federal Court Grants Injunction for Right of Entry Permits

A federal judge allowed union officials with permits to enter a construction site for discussions and health inspections, despite objections from the employer. This decision ensures that workers' rights are protected under workplace laws.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·17 Sept 2015

Federal Court Rules Employer Must Provide Adequate Termination Notice

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·29 June 2015

Federal Court Dismisses Appeal Over Adverse Action Claims

In this case, the Federal Court dismissed an appeal challenging a decision made by the lower court regarding whether subcontracting charter work and removing a roster system constituted adverse action under the Fair Work Act. The court upheld the a person judge's findings that these actions were not taken because of participation in industrial activities.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·07 May 2015

NSW Court of Appeal Upholds Employer Liability for Compensation Based on Injury Occurrence Date

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·02 Apr 2015

Federal Court Declares Employer Accessory to Workplace Law Violations

In this case, the a person successfully sued an employer for a person liability to a subcontractor's breaches of workplace laws. The employer was declared liable because they were aware of the subcontractor's non-compliance with minimum wage and superannuation requirements but did not take any action.

AllowedDistrict Court of New South Wales·05 Feb 2015

Employer Found Guilty for Failing to Ensure Employee Safety

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·17 Dec 2014

Employer Can Enforce Statutory Debt Under Workers Compensation Act

Struck OutSupreme Court of New South Wales·20 Nov 2014

Statement of Claim Struck Out for Lack of Compliance with Statutory Requirements

A worker's statement of claim was struck out by the NSW Supreme Court because it did not clearly state a cause of action and did not meet the necessary statutory requirements under NSW workers compensation laws.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·04 July 2014

Federal Court Denies Employer's Application for Costs in Employment Claims Case

In this case, the Federal Court of Australia decided to deny the employer's request for costs related to employment claims under the Fair Work Act and the Sex Discrimination Act. The court ruled that the employer was not entitled to costs for claims under the Fair Work Act when the employee's claims under the Sex Discrimination Act failed.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·05 Mar 2014

Federal Court Declares Union Contravention of Fair Work Act

In this case, the Federal Court found that a union and its officer had violated the Fair Work Act by organising workers to refuse to work unless an employee who had been fired was given his job back. As a result, the court ordered them to pay fines.

DismissedIndustrial Relations Commission (NSW)·17 Feb 2014

Recent Amendments Limit Appeals in NSW Industrial Relations Commission

The NSW Industrial Relations Commission decided that recent changes to the Industrial Relations Act 1996 affect how appeals are handled. These changes mean that some appeals can no longer be heard by the Commission and must be sent to the Supreme Court.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·11 Feb 2014

Federal Court: An Online Retailer Found to be True Employer of Workers

In a case brought by the a person, the Federal Court determined that an online retailer was the true employer of certain workers despite attempts to use other companies for payroll purposes. This decision highlights the importance of identifying the correct employer based on the overall business relationship.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·16 Oct 2013

Federal Court Rejects Leave to Appeal on Employment Costs Order

In this case, the Federal Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal regarding a decision that required the claimant to provide information about his entitlement to costs in employment proceedings. The court affirmed its power to issue additional orders related to the calculation and recovery of legal costs after making an initial order.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·11 Oct 2013

Federal Court fines Victoria $25,000 for breaching Fair Work Act

In this case, the Federal Court fined the a person $25,000 for breaching the a person Work Act by engaging in coercive conduct against workers' unions. The court emphasised the need to deter such behavior and considered the State's history of similar contraventions.

AllowedDistrict Court of New South Wales·27 Sept 2013

Employment Contract Notice Period Clarified in NSWDC Decision

OtherIndustrial Relations Commission (NSW)·18 Sept 2013

Questions of Law Referred to Full Bench in Employment Case

OtherIndustrial Relations Commission (NSW)·04 Dec 2012

Employer Fined for Workplace Accident Risks

← PreviousPage 4 · 221 judgmentsNext →
Employment — Case law | VadeLab