VadeLab

Environmental & Planning

Environmental & Planning judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·22 Sept 2005

Appeal Upheld: Parking and Privacy Concerns Modified in Development Consent

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·11 Sept 2005

Cluster Housing Accessways Not Prohibited Under Clause 34.1(d)

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·06 Sept 2005

Commissioner's Decision on Existing Use Rights in Land and Environment Court

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·31 Aug 2005

Successful Appeal Against Statutory Enforcement Order

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·12 July 2005

Land and Environment Court Rejects Development Applications Due to Environmental Concerns

The Land and Environment Court rejected development applications for residential and small lot subdivisions due to unresolved environmental and drainage issues. The court emphasised the need for compliance with local environmental plans and protection of endangered species habitats.

OtherLand and Environment Court (NSW)·28 June 2005

Weight of Unsworn Evidence in Environmental Assessments

In this case, the Court addressed questions about the weight of unsworn evidence and procedural fairness during an environmental assessment. The Court emphasised the importance of ensuring that the process is fair, even when not strictly adhering to traditional rules of evidence.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·03 June 2005

Land and Environment Court Can Make Costs Order After Final Orders

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·18 May 2005

Proposed Residential Flat Building Prohibited Under Local Environmental Plan

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·17 May 2005

Land and Environment Court Upholds Appeal Against Unlawful Removal Order

The Land and Environment Court of NSW heard an appeal against a local government order requiring the removal of various items from a rural/residential property. The court found the order unreasonable and issued a revised order to address unsightly conditions while allowing the property owner to retain necessary building components for an innovative dwelling.

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·20 Apr 2005

No Further Written Submissions to Court Experts in Environmental Appeals

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·01 Apr 2005

Development Application Appeal Allowed in Rural 1(c) Zone

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·14 Mar 2005

Land and Environment Court Rules Property as Farmland Due to Grazing Activities

In this case, the Land and Environment Court decided that a piece of land should be classified as farmland because it was primarily used for grazing cattle. The court considered factors such as the size of the land, the presence of grazing activities, and the commercial purpose of the business.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·16 Dec 2004

Development Applications for Dual Occupancy and Subdivisions Allowed by Land and Environment Court

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·01 Dec 2004

Appeal Dismissed Over Hardstand Car Space Condition

The Land and Environment Court dismissed an appeal challenging a condition to delete a hardstand car space. The condition was upheld because the car space would negatively impact the uniformity of semi-detached dwellings and the streetscape.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·18 Nov 2004

Compensation for Reduced Land Value Following Compulsory Acquisition

OtherLand and Environment Court (NSW)·03 Nov 2004

Fine Imposed for Failing to Comply with Development Consent Conditions

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·22 Oct 2004

Appeal dismissed on development contributions under Environmental Planning Act

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·19 Oct 2004

Development Application for Dual Occupancy Allowed by Land and Environment Court NSW

The Land and Environment Court of NSW allowed a development application for a dual occupancy project, subject to specific conditions under environmental planning policies. The decision was based on the application's compliance with relevant legislation and the need to protect the environment.

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·07 Oct 2004

Development Proposal Rejected for Impact on Adjacent Residential Zones

The Land and Environment Court rejected a development proposal for a mixed-use building because it failed to properly consider its impact on nearby residential areas and did not align with urban design goals set by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·30 Sept 2004

Commonwealth Allowed to Join Proceedings Over Tourist Resort Objections

← PreviousPage 18 · 400 judgmentsNext →