VadeLab

Environmental & Planning

Environmental & Planning judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·19 July 2002

Watercourse Not Considered a River Under Rivers Act

The NSW Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging a development consent. The court ruled that a watercourse on the developer's land was not a river under the Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948, thus no permit was required for excavation.

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·09 July 2002

Claimant Loses Right to Compensation Due to Repeal of Legislation

The Court of Appeal ruled that the claimant's right to claim compensation was extinguished due to the repeal of section 342AC and the time limits for claims. The claimant argued that their claim was still valid, but the court disagreed.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·03 June 2002

Summary Dismissal of Vexatious Litigant’s Claim in NSW Supreme Court

AllowedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·08 Apr 2002

Council Held Liable for Footpath Damage Caused by Tree Roots

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·27 Mar 2002

Computer Game Facility Found to Be an 'Amusement Centre' Under Hurstville's Local Environmental Plan

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·12 Dec 2001

Validity of Administrator Appointment to Local Aboriginal Land Council

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·26 July 2001

Development Consent Required for Alterations to Heritage Buildings

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·05 June 2001

Amendment of Summons Allowed in Environmental Offense Case

In this environmental offense case, the Land and Environment Court allowed the amendment of the summons to include a specific timeframe for the alleged offense, ensuring a fair trial for the defendant.

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·24 May 2001

Costs Order Varied in Class One Appeal

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·11 May 2001

Mineral Processing Facility Development Approved with Environmental Protections

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·01 May 2001

Court Grants Leave for Amended Development Plans

OtherLand and Environment Court (NSW)·26 Mar 2001

Costs Ruling in Development Consent Dispute

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·12 Feb 2001

Landowner Wins Right to Compensation for Partial Access Loss

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·20 Oct 2000

Judicial Review Upholds Validity of Development Consent

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·27 July 2000

Contempt Case for Non-Compliance with Animal Control Order

The court found a tenant in contempt for not reducing the rabbit population at their address as ordered by the local government. The tenant was fined and ordered to pay costs.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·21 July 2000

Land and Environment Court Approves Housing Project for Seniors and Disabled

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·12 May 2000

Federal Court Rejects Environmental Nuisance Suit

In this environmental law case, the Federal Court dismissed a lawsuit brought by individuals claiming injuries from industrial emissions. The court ruled that the claims did not meet the criteria for jurisdiction under the Trade Practices Act and thus lacked merit.

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·28 Apr 2000

Judge Not Disqualified Despite Previous Related Ruling

OtherLand and Environment Court (NSW)·04 Feb 2000

Company Fined for Tarban Creek Water Pollution

A company was fined for causing water pollution in Tarban Creek during construction. Despite having measures to control sediment, the company failed to prevent pollution, leading to fines and recognition of the environmental impact.

DismissedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·11 Nov 1998

Court Denies Costs for Successful Planning Appeal

← PreviousPage 20 · 400 judgments
Environmental & Planning — Case law | VadeLab