VadeLab

Environmental & Planning

Environmental & Planning judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·14 Aug 2017

Development Application Granted with Conditions Following Conciliation Agreement

RefusedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·11 Aug 2017

Childcare Centre Expansion Appeal Refused Due to Overdevelopment

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·07 Aug 2017

Claimant Amends Development Application and Wins Appeal

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·27 July 2017

Appeal Upheld: Resource Recovery Facility Must Comply with Conditions of Consent

The Land and Environment Court upheld an appeal regarding compliance with conditions for a resource recovery facility. The court substituted the original orders with new ones, requiring the applicant to submit an application for approval of a cell design within six months.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·21 July 2017

Shop Top Housing Project Approved with Conditions by Land and Environment Court

RefusedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·14 July 2017

Development Application Refused for Adverse Impact on Heritage Items

The Land and Environment Court refused a development application because it would negatively impact the heritage significance of existing heritage items. The Court considered the impact of the proposed development on the heritage items and determined that it would not facilitate their conservation, leading to the refusal of the application.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·07 July 2017

Development Application Appeal Upheld with Modifications

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·19 June 2017

Claimant Wins Appeal for Six-Storey Residential Building

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·16 June 2017

Development Application Approved with Conditions in Land and Environment Court Case

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·08 June 2017

Land and Environment Court Orders Bamboo Hedge Pruning

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·05 May 2017

Land and Environment Court Grants Consent for Affordable Housing Project Amid Resident Objections

The Land and Environment Court granted permission for a residential flat building project that includes affordable housing, despite objections from nearby residents. The Court considered the project's compliance with environmental planning policies and the public interest in providing more affordable housing options.

OtherLand and Environment Court (NSW)·01 May 2017

Tree Removal Without Council Consent Results in Fine

Allowed in PartLand and Environment Court (NSW)·11 Apr 2017

Tree Causing Property Damage - Land and Environment Court Decision

In this case, the claimant asked the court to remove a tree that was damaging their property. While the court did not allow the tree's removal, it did order the respondent to help cover the costs of repairing the damage.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·03 Apr 2017

Boundary Fence Modification Approved in Heritage Conservation Area

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·23 Mar 2017

Development Approved After Conciliation Agreement in Land and Environment Court Case

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·23 Dec 2016

Development Application Amended After Agreement Reached During Conciliation Conference

In this case, the claimant amended their development application after reaching an agreement with the council during a conciliation conference. The court approved the amendment and issued the necessary orders.

AllowedLand and Environment Court (NSW)·21 Dec 2016

Development Application for Mixed-Use Building in Mascot Approved with Conditions

Allowed in PartLand and Environment Court (NSW)·20 Dec 2016

Financial Assurance Requirements for Environmental Protection Licences

AllowedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·13 Dec 2016

Councils Can Appeal Environmental Offences as Prosecutors - NSW Court of Appeal

AllowedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·12 Dec 2016

Employer Liability for Asbestos Exposure Overturned

The NSW Court of Appeal decided that an employer's responsibility for asbestos-related health issues starts when the worker was last exposed to asbestos in their job. This ruling overturned a previous decision by a lower court.

← PreviousPage 8 · 400 judgmentsNext →