VadeLab

Family

Family judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·14 May 2024

Adoption Discharge Due to Irretrievable Breakdown Between Parties

The Supreme Court of NSW discharged an adoption order because of an irretrievable breakdown in the relationship between the parties. The Court found that there was an exceptional reason to discharge the order, allowing the applicant to return to their birth identity.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·01 Mar 2019

Adoption Order Made for Child's Best Interests

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·19 Oct 2018

Application for Estate Provision Dismissed by NSW Supreme Court

The NSW Supreme Court dismissed an application for provision out of the estate of a deceased parent. The court found that the deceased's will had already made adequate provision for the claimant, rejecting the claimant's request for further provision.

AllowedChildren's Court of New South Wales·30 July 2018

Father Granted Costs Against Department in Children's Court Case

AllowedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·15 Dec 2017

NSW Court of Appeal Overturns Family Provision Order

The NSW Court of Appeal ruled that a lower court's decision to grant family provision to a respondent was incorrect. The Court emphasised the importance of understanding the testator's intentions and the moral obligations owed to beneficiaries, ultimately dismissing the respondent's claim for family provision.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·05 Nov 2015

NSW Supreme Court Rejects Anti-Suit Injunction Request

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·02 Apr 2014

Family Provision Order Granted Under Succession Act 2006

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·20 Dec 2013

Costs for Setting Aside Notices to Produce in Family Court Cases

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·27 Mar 2013

Parentage Order Granted Due to Exceptional Circumstances

The Court granted a parentage order to the claimant, who lived near the border of NSW and Victoria, due to exceptional circumstances. The child was conceived through procedures in NSW, but the parties resided in Victoria.

AllowedChildren's Court of New South Wales·10 Feb 2012

Children's Court Awards Costs Against Party, Not Non-Party

In this case, the Children's Court ruled that it can only order costs against a party to the proceedings, not against a non-party like a legal representative. The court ordered the mother to pay the father's costs.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·23 Aug 2011

Family Provision Order for De Facto Spouse Secures Future Needs

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·25 Nov 2010

Spouse Entitled to Larger Inheritance Due to Financial Needs

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·27 Apr 2010

Adoption Order Granted for Child with Special Needs Despite Birth Parents' Opposition

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·24 Feb 2010

Claimant Entitled to Modest Estate Provision Under Family Provision Act

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·11 May 2009

Company Proceedings Transferred to Family Court for Centralised Resolution

AllowedDistrict Court of New South Wales·12 Sept 2008

Family Provision Claim Allowed in NSWDC

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·25 July 2006

Spouse Receives Entire Estate Under Family Provision Act

The claimant asked for a share of the deceased's estate under the Family Provision Act 1982. The NSW Supreme Court ruled that the claimant should receive the entire estate because the deceased did not make adequate provision for the claimant's needs.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·09 June 2006

Claimant Awarded $20,000 From Step-Mother’s Estate Under Family Provision Act

Associate Justice McLaughlin awarded the claimant $20,000 from his late stepmother's estate under the Family Provision Act 1982, ruling that the claimant had not been adequately provided for.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·22 May 2006

Supreme Court Dismisses Abuse of Process Claim in Family Law Proceedings

The Supreme Court dismissed an application to transfer proceedings from the District Court to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled that starting new proceedings in the Supreme Court covering the same subject matter as existing District Court proceedings is an abuse of process. The claimant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 May 2006

Request for Estate Provision Under Family Provision Act Rejected

Page 1 · 35 judgmentsNext →