VadeLab

General & Other

General & Other judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·19 Aug 2014

Federal Court Allows Amendment of Native Title Claim Group

In this case, the Federal Court allowed a a company to amend its composition by adding or removing apical ancestors from their list. This decision follows the legal requirements set out in s 251B of the Native Title Act and ensures that proper notice was given to all relevant parties.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia (Full Court)·21 July 2014

Federal Court Declares Sublease Restriction on Geographic Name Unreasonable

DismissedFederal Court of Australia (Full Court)·21 July 2014

Federal Court Rejects Appeal Over Geographic Name Use

The Federal Court of Australia dismissed an appeal where the claimant tried to prevent another business from using a geographic name. The court ruled that the claimant did not sufficiently demonstrate exclusive rights over the term, leading to dismissal.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·02 July 2014

Federal Court Imposes $1.2 Million Penalty for Continuous Disclosure Violations

A company was fined $1.2 million for not telling the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) about expected changes in its financial performance that could affect stock prices or values. This case highlights the importance of timely and accurate disclosure to maintain market integrity.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·26 June 2014

Property Held on Trust for Both Parties

The Supreme Court of New South Wales decided that a property purchased by a family member for another is held on trust for both parties in equal shares if there is a mutual intention to do so.

AllowedDistrict Court of New South Wales·20 June 2014

Defamation Claim Against Indigenous Surfer Not Dismissed

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·03 June 2014

Orders Facilitating Sale of Rare Bank Notes

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·30 May 2014

Contract declared void for harshness, compensation ordered

The court declared a contract void because it was considered harsh or unjust. The contract involved the liability of a loan being shared among certain parties. As a result, compensation and interest payments were ordered.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·28 May 2014

Supreme Court Approves Settlement for Minor Brain Injury

The Supreme Court of New South Wales approved a settlement for a minor plaintiff who suffered a brain injury from a water feature. The court considered the risks of establishing liability and approved a reduced settlement amount.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·16 May 2014

Injunction Granted to Stop Asset Disposal

Allowed in PartDistrict Court of New South Wales·17 Apr 2014

Defamation Case: $6,000 Damages Awarded

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·11 Apr 2014

NSW Supreme Court Rejects Claimant's Disability Insurance Claim Due to Mental Health Issues

The NSW Supreme Court dismissed a claimant's disability insurance claim, ruling that his mental health issues did not qualify as partial disability under the policy. The court found the claimant's evidence unreliable and concluded that he was not partially disabled.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·11 Apr 2014

Adjudicator's Jurisdiction Under Security of Payment Act

DismissedDistrict Court of New South Wales·10 Apr 2014

No Contract or Negligence Found in Property Inspection Case

The court dismissed the claim for breach of contract and negligent misstatement, finding no causal link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiffs' losses.

Allowed in PartSupreme Court of New South Wales·25 Mar 2014

NSW Supreme Court Limits Discovery Requests

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·12 Mar 2014

Specific Performance Granted for Property Sale Failure

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·11 Mar 2014

Claimant Must Be Available for Cross-Examination Despite Difficulties

In this case, the court decided that the claimant must still be available for cross-examination during a hearing, even though they had physical difficulties. The court felt that the claimant's evidence was important to the legal issues being discussed.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·18 Feb 2014

Creditors' Meeting Convening Period Extended in NSW Supreme Court

OtherSupreme Court of New South Wales·19 Dec 2013

Costs Awarded on Indemnity Basis for Manifestly Groundless Claims

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·05 Dec 2013

Application for Correction of Judgment Dismissed

← PreviousPage 18 · 833 judgmentsNext →
General & Other — Case law | VadeLab