VadeLab

General & Other

General & Other judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·22 July 2008

Federal Court Rules Share Placement Invalid Due to Illegitimate Purpose

In this case, a company's decision to issue new shares was deemed invalid because it was done with the intention of preventing another major shareholder from taking control. The judge ruled that issuing shares for such an ulterior purpose is not allowed under Australian corporate law.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·17 July 2008

Claim for Defective Work During Active Contract Dismissed

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·16 July 2008

Court Refuses Indemnity Costs for Claimant's Reasonable Offer Rejection

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·28 May 2008

Claimant's Property Title Restored in NSW Supreme Court

Allowed in PartSupreme Court of New South Wales·21 May 2008

Client Legal Privilege Waived Through Voluntary Disclosure

AllowedNSW Caselaw (corte não mapeada: NSWDDT)·19 May 2008

Cross-claim Not Subject to Claims Resolution Process in NSW Dust Diseases Tribunal

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·12 May 2008

Corporate Insolvency and Winding-Up Procedures Explained

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·09 May 2008

Claimant Granted Judgment for Possession of Land Despite Farm Debt Mediation Act Arguments

RefusedSupreme Court of New South Wales·01 May 2008

Supreme Court Rejects Additional Expert Evidence

The Supreme Court of New South Wales refused to accept new expert evidence after a single expert had already been appointed. This decision was based on the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·17 Apr 2008

Will Construction and Superannuation Entitlements in NSW Supreme Court

In this case, the Court decided that superannuation entitlements are not considered 'financial accounts' under the will's clause 3(b). This decision affects how the estate is distributed among the beneficiaries.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 Apr 2008

Challenging Costs Assessments and Determinations in NSW

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·28 Mar 2008

Appeal Allowed: Agency Error in Lower Court Decision

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·13 Mar 2008

Mortgagee Granted Possession of Mortgaged Property in NSW Supreme Court Case

DismissedDistrict Court of New South Wales·05 Mar 2008

Dismissed: Summary Judgment Application Under Security of Payment Act

In a case involving a dispute over architectural services, the NSW District Court dismissed a summary judgment application because there was a serious conflict between the parties regarding the service of payment claims under the Security of Payment Act. The court found that the issue was not suitable for summary judgment due to conflicting evidence.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·30 Jan 2008

Proceedings on Distribution of Proceeds from Reinsurance Agreement

Allowed in PartSupreme Court of New South Wales·30 Jan 2008

NSW Supreme Court Orders Half Costs Payment in Partially Successful Claim

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·14 Dec 2007

NSW Supreme Court Declares Binding Agreement and Orders Specific Performance

The NSW Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiff and defendant had entered into a binding agreement for the transportation of export goods. The court declared the agreement valid and ordered the defendant to fulfill the terms of the agreement.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·13 Dec 2007

Federal Court Orders Shareholder Meeting on Company Merger

The Federal Court ordered a meeting for an online retailer's shareholders to consider a proposed merger with ARC Energy. This decision allows shareholders to vote on whether to proceed with the arrangement, which involves exchanging shares between the two companies.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia (Full Court)·28 Nov 2007

Federal Court of Australia rules on trade mark ownership in dispute over retail bags

In this case, the Federal Court of Australia decided on disputes over trade mark ownership between two a person. The court dismissed an appeal and allowed a a person-appeal, emphasising that first use alone does not establish ownership if distinctiveness is lacking. This decision affects claims of passing off based on unestablished marks.

AllowedDistrict Court of New South Wales·27 Nov 2007

Personal Injury Claim Successful Despite Compliance Issues

← PreviousPage 27 · 833 judgmentsNext →