VadeLab

General & Other

General & Other judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·13 Aug 2021

Stay Application and Amended Claim Dismissed in NSW Supreme Court

The NSW Supreme Court dismissed a request to stop enforcing judgments and a request to amend a claim. The court ruled that a judgment creditor can enforce judgments regardless of any outstanding liability to a bank.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·13 Aug 2021

Supreme Court Varies Orders and Grants Indemnity Costs in Civil Procedure Case

In this civil procedure case, the Supreme Court varied orders to reflect findings that favoured the defendant after they successfully a person-claimed against the plaintiff for breach of contract. The court also awarded the defendant indemnity costs from a date when the plaintiff was notified of fatal flaws in their case.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·23 July 2021

Claimant's Litigation Dismissed, Ordered to Pay Respondents' Costs

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·26 May 2021

Federal Court Appoints New Liquidators for Seven Companies

A court order appointed new liquidators for seven companies after the current liquidator announced his retirement. This ensures that the process of closing down these businesses can continue smoothly without significant delays or costs.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·10 May 2021

Federal Court Grants Order for Identifying Online Defamation Perpetrators

The Federal Court of Australia ordered an online platform to provide preliminary discovery, including identification details of unknown individuals who posted defamatory comments online. This decision allows a property developer to proceed with legal action against the perpetrators of these harmful statements.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·28 Apr 2021

Claimant Ordered to Pay Costs for Failing to Attend Hearings

Allowed in PartDistrict Court of New South Wales·16 Apr 2021

Defamation Case Allows Conditional Pleading Back of Contextual Imputations

In a defamation case, the court allowed the defendant to plead back certain statements conditionally, ensuring fairness in the proceedings. This decision was made based on the adequacy of the details provided in the defense.

AllowedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·26 Mar 2021

Condition Precedent Must Be Met for Contract Enforcement

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·12 Mar 2021

Improper Email Service of Notice to Admit Facts Set Aside

The Supreme Court of NSW set aside a Notice to Admit Facts because it was improperly served by email without the recipient's consent. The court ruled that consent must be given for serving court documents via email.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·02 Mar 2021

Assessment of Damages in Subdivision Agreement Dispute

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·26 Feb 2021

Federal Court Grants Extension for Second Creditors' Meeting

The Federal Court granted an extension for a second meeting of a person to be held. This allowed the company's administrators to secure funding necessary to meet debts during this extended period, ensuring protection for a person' interests.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·23 Feb 2021

Successful Strike Out Leads to Costs Order - NSW Supreme Court Decision

In this case, the defendant successfully moved to strike out the plaintiff's Commercial List Statement. As a result, the Court ordered that the plaintiffs pay the defendant's costs. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in legal filings.

OtherFederal Court of Australia·12 Feb 2021

Federal Court Approves Discontinuation of Representative Proceeding

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·05 Feb 2021

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Costs Agreement Enforceability

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·10 Dec 2020

Supreme Court Rejects Discovery Application

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·04 Dec 2020

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Amend Misleading and Deceptive Conduct Claim

The Supreme Court of New South Wales allowed a party to amend their defence to include new arguments based on misleading representations and a contractual exclusion clause, despite objections from the opposing party.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·24 Nov 2020

Insurer Not Obliged to Pay Defence Costs in Advance

In this case, the Federal Court of Australia ruled that an a person company does not have to pay for legal defense costs until there is a court decision confirming that the claims against a person party are covered by their a person policy and do not fall under any exclusions. This means the a person can refuse to cover these costs even if they believe the claim might eventually be covered.

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·23 Nov 2020

Equitable Charge Awarded for Misappropriated Funds in NSW Supreme Court Case

In this case, the court decided to impose an equitable charge on certain assets to compensate for funds that were misappropriated. The charge includes interest on the traceable amount, reflecting the full economic value of the misappropriated funds at the time of the trial.

AllowedDistrict Court of New South Wales·20 Nov 2020

Claimant Wins Boat Purchase Dispute Against First Defendant

DismissedCourt of Appeal (NSW)·19 Nov 2020

Appeal Rejected: Court Denies Introduction of Additional Evidence

← PreviousPage 6 · 833 judgmentsNext →
General & Other — Case law | VadeLab