VadeLab

General & Other

General & Other judgments from Australian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·28 Nov 2019

Proceedings Dismissed: Legal Representation Required in Commercial Litigation

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·15 Nov 2019

Statute-Barred Proceedings and Indemnity Costs Decision

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·14 Nov 2019

Statutory Demand Set Aside Due to Offsetting Claim

In this case, the claimant successfully challenged a statutory demand issued by the respondent. The court ruled in favour of the claimant, setting aside the statutory demand due to an offsetting claim. The decision was based on the claimant's right to offset a debt with a counterclaim, even though the claim was not fully articulated in the initial filing.

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·13 Nov 2019

Federal Court Approves Scheme of Arrangement

The Federal Court approved a business restructuring plan called a 'scheme of arrangement' proposed by a company for its shareholders. This decision ensures the plan is legally valid and fair to those involved, as it met all necessary legal requirements and was supported by members.

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·08 Nov 2019

Federal Court Denies Injunction Against Company AGM

A company was facing an urgent request to stop its Annual General Meeting (AGM) from happening. However, the Federal Court decided not to grant this injunction because there wasn't enough evidence that stopping the AGM would be necessary or timely.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·14 Oct 2019

Application to Appoint Tutor for Defendant in Possession Proceeding Dismissed

In a case where a defendant was seeking to have a tutor appointed due to mental health concerns, the NSW Supreme Court ruled that the evidence did not prove the defendant was unable to manage their own affairs. Therefore, the application to appoint a tutor was dismissed.

RefusedSupreme Court of New South Wales·14 Oct 2019

Supreme Court Refuses Costs Order for Interlocutory Hearings

RefusedSupreme Court of New South Wales·01 Oct 2019

Supreme Court Restricts Unrepresented Litigant’s Motions

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·17 Sept 2019

Misleading and Deceptive Conduct in Trade: Damages Awarded

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·11 Sept 2019

Federal Court Rejects Trade Mark Claims Against Union During Industrial Campaign

In this case, a company sued a union for using its brand logo in an industrial campaign. The Federal Court dismissed all claims, ruling that such use does not infringe on trademarks or mislead a person if the sign is not being used as a trademark.

OtherSupreme Court of New South Wales·02 Sept 2019

NSW Supreme Court Adjourns Proceedings to Ensure Plaintiff Communication

DismissedFederal Court of Australia·28 Aug 2019

Relatives Not Eligible as Class Members Due to Jurisdictional Requirements

In this case, the Federal Court determined that claimant's relatives were not eligible to be part of a settlement agreement related to the a person incident due to specific legal requirements regarding jurisdiction.

DismissedDistrict Court of New South Wales·23 Aug 2019

Former Solicitor Not Liable for Costs in NSW Case

Allowed in PartFederal Court of Australia·15 Aug 2019

Federal Court Grants Default Judgment in Unjust Enrichment Case

In this case, a company successfully obtained a court order (default judgment) against another party for unjustly keeping funds that should have been used for specific purposes. However, the claim was not successful against the other defendant because there wasn't enough information provided in the initial documents to prove their wrongdoing.

DismissedSupreme Court of New South Wales·09 Aug 2019

Supreme Court Rejects Son's Claim for Estate Provision

AllowedFederal Court of Australia·31 July 2019

Federal Court Presumes Insolvency and Wounds Up Company

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·26 July 2019

Security of Payment Fraud Claim Rejected: Defendant Ordered to Pay $450,000

In a recent ruling, the NSW Supreme Court ordered the defendant to pay $450,000 into court within 7 days, rejecting the defendant's claim of financial hardship and the argument that only a smaller amount should be paid pending the final resolution of the claim.

RefusedSupreme Court of New South Wales·15 July 2019

Supreme Court Rejects Leave to Appeal on Technical Grounds

The Supreme Court of New South Wales denied the claimant's request to appeal a previous decision on technical grounds, stating that the claimant did not provide enough reason to overturn the original judgment.

AllowedNSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Occupational Division)·05 July 2019

Lawyer Removed From Roll for Misappropriation and Breach of Regulations

AllowedSupreme Court of New South Wales·03 July 2019

Scheme of Arrangement Approved in NSW Supreme Court

← PreviousPage 9 · 833 judgmentsNext →
General & Other — Case law | VadeLab