VadeLab

Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Increased After Conciliation Conference

Land and Environment Court (NSW)

This page reproduces the official decision. It is published for readers who need the full text and is deliberately excluded from search engines.This decision was issued by the Land and Environment Court (NSW) and is reproduced from NSW Caselaw (Β© State of New South Wales) under its published republication policy. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.View on the official source β†—

πŸ“œ Headnote Official document

The Court increased the compensation amount from $588,581.00 to $694,000.00 after a conciliation conference between the parties, under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991.

πŸ“š Full judgment Official document

Land and [ADDRESS] South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: [NAME] v [NAME] [2020] NSWLEC 1337 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 July 2020 Date of orders: 31 July 2020 Decision date: 31 July 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: See orders at [7] below. Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: [NAME] (First Applicant) [NAME] (Second Applicant) [NAME] (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: [redacted] [NAME] (Respondent)

Solicitors: [redacted] [NAME] (Respondent) File Number(s): 2020/149102 Publication restriction: No

Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: The proceedings comprise an objection to an offer of compensation on 21 February 2020 in the amount of $588,581.00 arising from compulsory acquisition by the Respondent of Lot 2 in DP 13492, being the whole of the land at [ADDRESS], North Nowra, from the Applicants under s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (the Act), with the Court required to determine the amount of compensation payable by the Respondent to the Applicants being within Class 3 of the Court's jurisdiction. 2. [ADDRESS] arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 ([NAME] Act) between the parties, which was held on 27 July 2020. I presided over the conciliation conference.

3. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision involved the Respondent agreeing to pay the Applicants the following amounts of compensation under the Act arising from the compulsory acquisition: Total compensation of $694,000.00 plus the Applicants' costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.

4. Under s 34(3) of the [NAME] Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision if the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties' decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 66(1) and (2) of the Act to hear and dispose of the Applicants' claim for compensation.

5. I am satisfied that the parties' decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the [NAME] Act.

6. As the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the [NAME] Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision. 7. [ADDRESS] orders that:

1. Compensation is determined in the sum of $694,000.00, pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Act), for the acquisition of Lot 2 in Deposited Plan 13492, being the whole of the land in Certificate of Title 2/13492 being known as [ADDRESS], North Nowra.

2. The Respondent is to pay the Applicants the amount of compensation referred to in Order (1), less any advance already paid, plus statutory interest on the balance of compensation calculated in accordance with sections 49 and 50 of the Act.

3. Within 28 days of the later of: 1. the date the Court issues its orders; and 2. the date on which the Respondent receives a duly executed deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment from the Applicants, the Respondent is to pay the Applicants the amount of compensation referred to in Order (1).

1. The Respondent has agreed to pay the Applicants' reasonable costs as agreed or assessed subject to the production of invoices and receipts. There is to be no interest payable on costs.

Notations: 1. Save for the costs agreed in Order (4) of these orders the sum of $529,722.90 plus statutory interest has already been paid to the Applicants leaving $164,277.10 remainder (the Remainder) to be paid; and 2. Statutory interest pursuant to sections 49 and 50 of the Act is payable on the Remainder.

…………………………

S Dixon

Senior Commissioner of the Court

********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 31 July 2020

Compulsory Acquisition Compensation Increased After Conciliation Conference β€” full judgment | VadeLab