VadeLab

Development Application Amended After Agreement Reached During Conciliation Conference

Land and Environment Court (NSW)

This page reproduces the official decision. It is published for readers who need the full text and is deliberately excluded from search engines.This decision was issued by the Land and Environment Court (NSW) and is reproduced from NSW Caselaw (Β© State of New South Wales) under its published republication policy. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.View on the official source β†—

πŸ“œ Headnote Official document

The claimant amended their development application after reaching an agreement with the council during a conciliation conference. The agreement was made under section 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the court disposed of the proceedings accordingly.

πŸ“š Full judgment Official document

Land and [ADDRESS] South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: [NAME] v Canterbury Bankstown Council [2016] NSWLEC 1633 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 26 October, 25 November, 2 and 22 December 2016 Date of orders: 23 December 2016 Decision date: 23 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: [NAME] C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: [NAME] (Applicant) Canterbury Bankstown Council(Respondent) Representation: Counsel: [redacted]

Solicitors: [redacted] [COMPANY] (Respondent) File Number(s): 181966/2016 Publication restriction: No

Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. [ADDRESS] also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 are:

1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application: Drawing No. Drawing Name Rev No. Prepared By: Dated DA01 Cover sheet F [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 DA04 Site plan and roof plan D [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA05 Site analysis and demolition plan D [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA06 Basement floor plan E [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA07 Ground floor plan G [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 DA08 Level 1 floor plan F [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA09 Level 2 floor plan G [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 DA10 Roof plan E [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA11 Elevations 1 E [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA12 Elevations 2 F [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 DA13 Sections F [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 DA14 Existing Shadow Diagram – June 21st B [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA15 Proposed Shadow Diagrams – June 21st E [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA16 Visualization 1 D [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA17 Visualization 2 C [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA18 Compliance schedule and BASIX requirements D [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA19 SEPP Compliance Summary D [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA20 Shadow 3D Analysis – Proposed D [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA22 DCP/ADG Compliant Envelope Study C [COMPANY] 15 December 2016 DA23 Solar Access – Diagrams E [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA24 Fence condition at rear boundary B [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA25 Long section and Bdyinterface at 63/65 Park St A [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 DA26 Northern external faΓ§ade view study B [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 DA27 Deep soil analysis plan B [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 DA28 Fence Detail to Northern Boundary A [COMPANY] 20 December 2016 Nos. 1-25 Solar Study [ADDRESS] – Compliant Envelope A [COMPANY] 4 December 2016 LPDA 16-78/1 Landscape Plan G [NAME] 5 December 2016

Document Title Prepared by Dated Basix Certificate No. 672027M

1. The Applicant is to pay those costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.

2. The appeal is upheld.

3. Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 568/2015 for the Demolition of existing structures and construction of a 3 storey residential flat building containing 8 units over on level of basement parking accommodating 10 car parking spaces at [ADDRESS], Campsie subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked "A". ……………. [NAME] Commissioner 181966.2016 (C Annexure A) (230 KB, pdf) 181966.2016Architectural Drawings (5.59 MB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 23 December 2016

Development Application Amended After Agreement Reached During Conciliation Conference β€” full judgment | VadeLab