Development Application Approved with Conditions
Land and Environment Court (NSW)
π Headnote Official document
In a conciliation conference, an agreement was reached between the parties regarding a development application for a residential building. The Land and Environment Court approved the application subject to specific conditions.
π Full judgment Official document
Land and [ADDRESS] South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: [COMPANY] v Georges River Council [2018] NSWLEC 1499 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 20 September 2018 Date of orders: 20 September 2018 Decision date: 20 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: [NAME] C Decision: See [4] below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: [COMPANY] (Applicant) Georges River Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: [redacted] [NAME] (Respondent)
Solicitors: [redacted] Georges River Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/217105 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. [ADDRESS] also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and [ADDRESS] 1979 are:
1. Leave is granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans, drawings and documents as referred to in the conditions of consent at Annexure A and included at Annexure B.
2. The appeal is upheld.
3. Development Application DA9/2017/112/1 for the construction of a residential flat building comprising fifty one (51) residential dwellings and six (6) serviced apartments over three (3) levels of basement parking for sixty three (63) car parking spaces at 2 β [ADDRESS], Kogarah is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
4. The Clause 4.6 request prepared by [NAME] with reference 0129/18 and dated 10 September 2018 is upheld.
5. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, in the amount of $84,000 on or before 30 November 2018. All previous costs orders in the proceedings are set aside. β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦β¦. [NAME] Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (474 KB, pdf) Annexure B (19.0 MB, pdf)
*************** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 02 October 2018
