Guardian Cannot Be Pursued for Costs if Incapacitated Individual Lacks Means
⚖️ Legal holding
A guardian representing a legally incapacitated individual cannot be pursued for costs if the individual lacks the means to pay.
📚 Full judgment
The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.
📄 Read the full judgment⚖️ View on the official court website ↗
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The plaintiff is under a legal incapacity and was represented by a guardian appointed by the State.
- The guardian felt an obligation to protect the plaintiff's interests and commenced litigation reasonably.
- Pursuing the guardian for costs would discourage others from taking on similar public service roles.
- The plaintiff is unlikely to have the resources to meet any costs order.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The successful party typically receives their costs as compensation.
- A Calderbank offer was made, offering to forego costs up to the date of the offer if the plaintiff withdrew the proceedings.
- The costs order would not be wholly ineffectual or futile, as it serves to recognize the appropriateness of the defendant's conduct.
- The public interest was considered, but the court found the case unarguable despite its unique circumstances.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Civil Procedure Act 2005 was applied, particularly section 98 which grants the court discretion in awarding costs.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that pursuing the guardian for costs would discourage others from taking on the role of guardian for legally incapacitated individuals.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, the decision suggests that a guardian cannot be pursued for costs if they are representing a legally incapacitated individual who lacks the means to pay.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify any specific evidence or documents that mattered in the decision.