VadeLab

Orders Facilitating Sale of Rare Bank Notes

Supreme Court of New South Wales

This page reproduces the official decision. It is published for readers who need the full text and is deliberately excluded from search engines.This decision was issued by the Supreme Court of New South Wales and is reproduced from NSW Caselaw (Β© State of New South Wales) under its published republication policy. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.View on the official source β†—

πŸ“œ Headnote Official document

The court granted orders facilitating the sale of rare bank notes held by a company in voluntary administration, while limiting the personal liability of the administrators if certain conditions were met.

πŸ“š Full judgment Official document

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Re [COMPANY] (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) [2014] NSWSC 728 Hearing dates: 2 June 2014 Decision date: 03 June 2014 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Lindsay J Decision: (1) An order (in the nature of judicial advice) made under s 447D of the Corporations Act 2001 Cth in relation to a proposed sale of property. (2) An order made under s 447A of the Act varying the operation of Part 5.3A (s 444F) so as to limit the liability of [NAME] in relation to property sold as property of the Company without notice of an adverse claim. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Voluntary Administration - Deeds of Company Arrangement - Generally - Appliation for an order (in the nature of judicial advice) under s 447D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Application for an order under s 447A of the Act to vary the operation of Part 5.3A so as to limit the liability of [NAME] in relation to property sold as property of the company without notice of an adverse claim Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Category: Principal judgment Parties: [NAME] and [NAME] in their capacity as [NAME] of [COMPANY] (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) ([NAME]) [COMPANY] (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) ([NAME]) Representation: Counsel: [redacted] Solicitors: [redacted] File Number(s): 2014/00153128

Judgment

INTRODUCTION 1The [NAME] ([NAME] and [NAME]) are [NAME] of the [NAME], [COMPANY] (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement). 2By an originating process filed on 21 May 2014 the plaintiffs, on an ex parte basis, make separate but interrelated applications under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): (a)[NAME] apply for directions under s 447D. (b)[NAME] and the Company apply for an order under s 447A that the operation of Part 5.3A of the Act be varied in relation to the Company. 3The occasion for both applications is a practical need to facilitate an orderly disposal of property (rare bank notes), in possession of the Company, that may be the subject of claims of ownership by strangers, presently unknown to [NAME] despite their endeavours to identify all competing claims to ownership of the property. 4Subject to the outcome of these proceedings, [NAME] have made arrangements to sell the subject property, between 15-31 July 2014, through three auction houses: [NAME]; [NAME]; and [NAME]. 5The relief sought by [NAME] under s 447D is a direction, in the nature of judicial advice, that [NAME] would be justified in adoption of a programme for the sale of the subject property, after advertising, followed by an application of proceeds of sale by reference to the Deed of Company Arrangement in respect of the Company. 6The relief sought by [NAME] and the Company under s 447A is an order for variation of s 444F of the Corporations Act so as to limit the personal liability of [NAME] to any owner of the subject property who has not notified a claim in respect of that property by one business day prior to its sale. 7The [NAME] are concerned to minimise their potential exposure to personal liability if they sell a valuable item of property which is subsequently proved to be owned by someone other than the Company.

COMPANY HISTORY 8The Company was incorporated on 19 June 1995. 9The principal of the Company throughout its existence has been [NAME], for whom the Company is named. He holds all but one of the Company's 5,000 shares. He is its sole director and shareholder. 10Pursuant to s 436A of the Corporations Act, the [NAME] were appointed voluntary administrators of the Company on 11 October 2012. 11On 28 November 2012 the Company's creditors resolved (pursuant to ss 439A and 439C of the Corporations Act) that the Company execute a deed of company arrangement, with the [NAME] as [NAME]. 12The deed was executed on 18 December 2012. 13Before it entered voluntary administration, the Company (under the day-to-day management of [NAME], assisted by two administrative staff) was engaged in the business of rare bank note dealings. 14That business involved three elements: (a)First, the Company's principal assets were (and still are) its holding of a large number of rare bank notes, from which it generated revenue from trading those notes. (b)Secondly, the Company generated revenue through consignment commissions it received on sales of rare bank notes, owned by third parties, effected by way of private sales or sales through auction houses. (c)Thirdly, the Company acted as a custodian, holding notes on behalf of third party owners for safe keeping. 15As a consequence of its consignment dealings and custodial arrangements, at the time it entered voluntary administration the Company had notes in its possession which were owned by third parties. 16The [NAME] have found that, despite substantial endeavours, they have not been able to exclude the possibility that some bank notes still within the possession of the Company belong to owners other than the Company. 17The Company's records have proven inadequate to the task, even with the involvement of [NAME] in it. The Company has no list of customers, no asset register, no creditor or debtor ledgers. Records of the ownership of particular bank notes have, at times, comprised nothing more secure than loose envelopes and rough pieces of paper noting ownership interests. [NAME]'s memory has proven to be fallible, both incomplete and inaccurate. 18The [NAME] presently have approximately 2,400 individual bank notes that they propose to sell, subject to the outcome of these proceedings. 19It is not necessary to record anything about the value of those notes beyond an acknowledgement that, collectively, they are estimated to have a substantial value. 20The [NAME] seek to realise the assets of the Company, and to provide a return to creditors, in an orderly way. 21The steps that they have undertaken since their appointment as voluntary administrators to verify the ownership of bank notes in the possession of the Company have included: (a)a review of the documentary records of the Company, including its books and records; (b)correspondence with the Company's accountants; (c)procurement of a Report as to Affairs from [NAME]; (d)inquiries made of financial institutions, including bank records and statements issued by the Company's bank; (e)inquiries of auction houses holding bank notes of the Company on consignment; (f)meetings and correspondence with [NAME] and his administrative staff; (g)searches of the Personal Property Securities Register; and (h)publication of details relating to the conduct of the affairs of the Company. 22The [NAME] have, amongst other things, sent at least three circulars to creditors (on 15 October, 2012, 7 November, 2012 and 12 March 2014); advertised for claims in The Australian Financial Review on 6 March 2014; and published an advertisement in the April 2014 edition of the specialist magazine, Australian Coin and Bank Note Magazine. 23In accordance with their usual practice [NAME] have caused the staff at their firm ([NAME]) to set up a page on the firm's website in relation to the administration of the Company. The URL for that webpage is: www.mcgrathnicol.com/administrations/[NAME]/. 24The [NAME]' advertisements have elicited a number of inquiries, but, in the nature of the case, they have not allowed [NAME] to exclude the possibility that, despite the passage of time since their first appointment, there may still be claims made to individual bank notes currently in the possession of the Company. 25I am satisfied that it is appropriate to grant the relief sought by the plaintiffs. [NAME] have taken substantial, reasonable steps to identify potential third party claims on property in the possession of the Company by persons unknown, and ostensibly unknowable, by them. The orders are designed to facilitate an orderly realisation of property for the benefit of creditors, with reasonable protection for such, if any, third party claimants there may still be and reasonable, personal protection for [NAME] engaged in performance of official duties. The passage of time since the Company entered administration, together with repeated advertisements published by [NAME], lends comfort to the adoption of orders designed to enable the affairs of the Company to be advanced in a prudential way. 26Accordingly, I make the following orders: (1)Direct that the [NAME] would be justified in: (a)dealing with the bank notes identified in Tab 4 of Exhibit SRF-1 to the affidavit of [NAME] affirmed on 21 May 2014 ("Unclaimed Notes") as the property of the [NAME]; (b)causing the Unclaimed Notes or any of them to be sold by public auction after causing to be published in The Australian Financial Review, at least five days before the auction, advertisements advising of the proposed auction of the Unclaimed Notes which include information substantially in terms of the notice contained at Tab 22 and Tab 23 of Exhibit SRF-1 to the affidavit of [NAME] affirmed on 21 May 2014; (c)causing the Unclaimed Notes or any of them to be sold by private sale after causing to be published in The Australian Financial Review, at least five days before the sale, advertisements advising of the proposed sale of the Unclaimed Notes which include information substantially in terms of the notice contained at Tab 22 and Tab 23 of Exhibit SRF-1 to the affidavit of [NAME] affirmed on 21 May 2014; and (d)applying the proceeds of sale of the Unclaimed Notes: (i)towards the payment of [NAME]' costs incurred in connection with realising the Unclaimed Notes; (ii)towards satisfying any valid claim against the [NAME] in respect of the Unclaimed Notes; and (iii)after a period of three months, distributing the balance of the proceeds of sale in accordance with the requirements of the Deed of Company Arrangement in respect of the [NAME], subject to the [NAME]' having complied with order 1(b) and/or order 1(c) above. (2)Order that the operation of Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act be varied by a variation of s 444F of the Act so as to limit the personal liability of the [NAME], to any owner of Unclaimed Notes who has not notified his, her or its claim in respect of such notes by one business day prior to their sale, to the amount of funds available to the [NAME] to meet such liability from the Deed Fund established under clause 9.1 of the Deed of Company Arrangement in respect of the [NAME]. (3)Order that the [NAME]' costs of the originating process be costs in the [NAME] of the [NAME]. (4)Reserve to any person affected by these orders liberty to apply on three days' notice.

********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 04 June 2014

Orders Facilitating Sale of Rare Bank Notes β€” full judgment | VadeLab