VadeLab

Proceeds of Crime Act Orders Granted in Consent Application

Supreme Court of New South Wales

This page reproduces the official decision. It is published for readers who need the full text and is deliberately excluded from search engines.This decision was issued by the Supreme Court of New South Wales and is reproduced from NSW Caselaw (Β© State of New South Wales) under its published republication policy. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.View on the official source β†—

πŸ“œ Headnote Official document

The NSW Supreme Court granted restraining and forfeiture orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) after all affected parties consented. The orders were made in relation to funds held in an account.

πŸ“š Full judgment Official document

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police application [2013] NSWSC 1377 Hearing dates: 19 September 2013 Decision date: 19 September 2013 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Restraining Order 1. Pursuant to s 19(1)(b) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (Act), the property) specified in the Schedule to these orders must not be disposed of or otherwise dealt with by any person except in the manner and circumstances specified in these orders. Custody and control order 2. Pursuant to s 38 of the Act, the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy is to take custody and control of the property specified in the Schedule to these orders. Ancillary orders 3. Pursuant to s 39(1)(e)(iii) of the Act, the following persons are to do all things necessary to give custody and control of the property specified in the Schedule to these orders to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy: a. [COMPANY] (ACN 123 654 008); and b. [NAME]. Forfeiture Order 4. Pursuant to s 49 of the Act, the property specified in the Schedule to these orders is forfeited to the Commonwealth, Other orders 5. Pursuant to s 69(2) of the Act, the Plaintiff and the Commonwealth have leave to deal with the forfeited property immediately, SCHEDULE: The sum of AUD256,041.40 held in an account with [COMPANY] (ACN 123 564 008) in the name of "[NAME]", client number 3468. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - proceeds of crime - restraining and forfeiture orders - no question of principle Legislation Cited: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Plaintiff) Representation: Counsel: [redacted] Solicitors: [redacted] File Number(s): 2010/274042

Judgment 1The Plaintiff applies for restraining orders under s 19 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) and orders pursuant to ss 38 and 39 of the Act as well as a forfeiture order under s 49 and an ancillary order that the forfeited property may be dealt with under s 69(2). The orders are put forward by consent. 2I note the terms of s 31(6) which enables the Court to make an order in respect of an application under s 19 if everyone has consented whom the Court has reason to believe would be affected by the order. Sub-s 2 provides that I do not have to be satisfied or consider the matters that the Court would otherwise need to consider under s 19. 3An affidavit of [NAME] sworn 11 September 2013 is relied upon. I have read that affidavit to satisfy myself that all parties who might be affected by the order have consented. In doing so, I have at the same time satisfied myself of the prerequisites to the making of an order without consent as s 19 requires. 4I note that one of the two persons, [NAME], is present in court with an interpreter and has indicated that he agrees to the orders. The other person who might be affected by the orders, [NAME], I am informed by the solicitor for the applicant has also consented to these orders and his solicitor's signature appears on the consent orders. 5Accordingly, I make orders in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in the short minutes of order and I note that there is no order for costs. 6The orders can be entered forthwith.

********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 20 September 2013

Proceeds of Crime Act Orders Granted in Consent Application β€” full judgment | VadeLab