VadeLab
OtherDistrict Court of New South Wales·

Sentence for Drug Trafficking Involving Commercial Quantities of Heroin

Case No.

⚖️ Legal holding

A person found guilty of knowingly taking part in the supply of a commercial quantity of prohibited drug is subject to severe penalties under the Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985.

Topics

criminal sentencingdrug traffickingcommercial quantity of drugs

Provisions

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985Crimes Act 1900

📚 Full judgment

The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.

📄 Read the full judgment⚖️ View on the official court website ↗

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The court accepted that the prisoners' involvement in this particular criminal scheme was uncharacteristic.
  • The court considered the prisoners' lack of prior involvement in drug supply as a mitigating factor.
  • The court considered the financial hardship caused by regular travel from Adelaide to New South Wales for bail compliance.
  • The court accepted that the prisoners' criminal histories were insignificant and irrelevant to sentencing.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the appropriate sentence for individuals found guilty of drug trafficking involving commercial quantities of heroin.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to impose severe sentences based on the seriousness of the offenses and the need to deter future drug trafficking activities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1bk5 and the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to impose penalties that reflect the severity of the offenses and the impact on society.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the individuals who were found guilty of drug trafficking.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should expect severe penalties if found guilty of drug trafficking involving commercial quantities of drugs.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included police searches, video recordings, and character testimonials from both the defense and prosecution.

Official source: District Court of New South Wales this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the District Court of New South Wales and is reproduced from NSW Caselaw (© State of New South Wales) under its published republication policy. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Sentence for Drug Trafficking - District Court NSW | VadeLab