VadeLab
StatuteAdministrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977

Section 9A — Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977: Limitation of jurisdiction to review related criminal justice process decisions

Text of the provision Official document

(1) Subject to subsection (2), at any time when: (a) a prosecution for an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory is before any court; or (b) an appeal arising out of such a prosecution is before any court; no court has jurisdiction to hear, continue to hear or determine an application under this Act, by the person who is or was the defendant in the prosecution, in relation to a related criminal justice process decision. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if an applicant has commenced an application under this Act before the commencement of a prosecution for an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, or of a State or a Territory. (3) Where subsection (2) applies, the prosecutor may apply to the court for a permanent stay of proceedings in the hearing and determination of the application and the court may grant such a stay if the court determines that: (a) the matters that are the subject of the application are more appropriately dealt with in the criminal justice process; and (b) a stay of proceedings will not substantially prejudice the applicant. (4) In this section: appeal includes an application for a new trial and a proceeding to review or call in question the proceedings, decision or jurisdiction of a court or judge. related criminal justice process decision, in relation to an offence, means: (a) a decision (other than a decision to prosecute) made in the criminal justice process in relation to the offence, including: (i) a decision in connection with the investigation, committal for trial or prosecution of the defendant; and (ii) a decision in connection with the appointment of investigators or inspectors for the purposes of such an investigation; and (iii) a decision in connection with the issue of a warrant, including a search warrant or a seizure warrant; and (iv) a decision requiring the production of documents, the giving of information or the summoning of persons as witnesses; and (v) a decision in connection with an appeal arising out of the prosecution; or (b) a decision of the Attorney-General to give a certificate under section 26 or 28 of the National Security Information (Criminal and Civil Proceedings) Act 2004 before or during a federal criminal proceeding (within the meaning of that Act) in relation to the offence. Note: A decision to prosecute a person for an offence is not reviewable under this Act: see paragraph (xa) of Schedule 1.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.