VadeLab
StatuteAdministrative Review Tribunal Act 2024

Section 88 — Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024: Evidence in dispute resolution process not admissible elsewhere

Text of the provision Official document

General rule (1) Evidence of anything said, any act done or any information disclosed at or for the sole purpose of a dispute resolution process is not admissible: (a) in a proceeding in the Tribunal; or (b) in any court; or (c) in any proceedings before a person authorised by a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory to hear evidence; or (d) in any proceedings before a person authorised by the consent of the parties to hear evidence. Exception—agreement of parties (2) Subsection (1) does not prevent the admission, at a proceeding in the Tribunal, of particular evidence if each party to the proceeding to which the dispute resolution process relates (other than a non-participating party to that dispute resolution process or that proceeding) agrees to the evidence being admitted. Exception—certain reports admissible (3) Subsection (1) does not prevent the admission, at a proceeding in the Tribunal, of a report prepared by a person conducting a dispute resolution process in the form of a neutral evaluation. (4) However, subsection (3) does not apply if, before the start of the hearing of the proceeding, a party to the proceeding to which the dispute resolution process relates notifies the Tribunal that the party objects to the report being admitted.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.