VadeLab
StatuteAge Discrimination Act 2004

Section 22 — Age Discrimination Act 2004: Qualifying bodies

Text of the provision Official document

(1) It is unlawful for an authority or body that is empowered to confer, renew, extend, revoke or withdraw an authorisation or qualification that is needed for or facilitates the practice of a profession, the carrying on of a trade or the engaging in of an occupation to discriminate against a person on the ground of the person’s age: (a) by refusing or failing to confer, renew or extend the authorisation or qualification; or (b) in the terms or conditions on which it is prepared to confer the authorisation or qualification or to renew or extend the authorisation or qualification; or (c) by revoking or withdrawing the authorisation or qualification or varying the terms or the conditions upon which it is held. Exemption for inherent requirements (2) This section does not make it unlawful for an authority or body to discriminate against a person, on the ground of the person’s age, if the person is unable to carry out the inherent requirements of the profession, trade or occupation because of his or her age. (3) In deciding whether the person is unable to carry out those requirements because of his or her age, take into account: (a) the person’s past training, qualifications and experience relevant to the particular profession, trade or occupation; and (b) if the person is already a member of the profession, carrying on the trade or engaged in the occupation—the person’s performance in the profession, trade or occupation; and (c) all other relevant factors that it is reasonable to take into account.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.