VadeLab
StatuteBankruptcy Act 1966

Section 262 — Bankruptcy Act 1966: Swearing of affidavits

Text of the provision Official document

(1) An affidavit to be used for the purposes of this Act may be sworn within the Commonwealth or a Territory before a person authorized to administer oaths for the purposes of the High Court or the Supreme Court of a State or Territory, a Judge of a Court having jurisdiction under this Act, an Official Receiver, a justice of the peace, a commissioner for affidavits or a commissioner for declarations. (2) An affidavit to be used for the purposes of this Act may be sworn at a place outside the Commonwealth and the Territories before: (aa) a Commissioner of the High Court authorized to administer oaths in that place for the purposes of the High Court; (a) a commissioner of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory for taking affidavits empowered and authorized to act in that place; (b) an Australian Diplomatic Officer or an Australian Consular Officer, as defined by the Consular Fees Act 1955, exercising his or her function in that place; (ba) an employee of the Commonwealth who is: (i) authorised under paragraph 3(c) of the Consular Fees Act 1955; and (ii) exercising his or her function in that place; (bb) an employee of the Australian Trade and Investment Commission who is: (i) authorised under paragraph 3(d) of the Consular Fees Act 1955; and (ii) exercising his or her function in that place; (c) a notary public exercising his or her function in that place; or (d) a person qualified to administer an oath in that place, being a person certified by a person mentioned in any of paragraphs (aa) to (c), or by the superior court of that place, to be so qualified.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.