VadeLab
StatuteBankruptcy Act 1966

Section 265A — Bankruptcy Act 1966: Offences relating to exercise of powers under section 77A or 130

Text of the provision Official document

(1) A person shall not refuse or fail to comply with a requirement under section 77A or 130. (1A) Subsection (1) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse. Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (1A) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code). (2) A person shall not, in purported compliance with a requirement under section 77A or 130, give information, or make a statement, that is, to the person’s knowledge, false or misleading in a material particular. (3) A person shall not: (a) obstruct or hinder a person in the exercise of a power under section 77A; or (b) obstruct or hinder a person who is executing a warrant issued under section 130. (3A) Subsection (3) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse. Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (3A) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code). (4) The occupier, or person in charge, of premises that a person enters under a warrant issued under section 130 shall provide to the last-mentioned person all reasonable facilities and assistance for the effective exercise of his or her powers under the warrant. Penalty: Imprisonment for 12 months.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.