VadeLab
StatuteCompetition and Consumer Act 2010

Section 52V — Competition and Consumer Act 2010: Section 52S—dominant purpose

Text of the provision Official document

For the purposes of paragraph 52S(1)(b), treat a change as not having the dominant purpose mentioned in that paragraph if the change is any of the following: (a) a change to an algorithm made as part of routine maintenance with the dominant purpose of ensuring the ongoing effectiveness of the algorithm; (b) a change to an algorithm with the dominant purpose of ensuring that the algorithm operates more quickly or more efficiently.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.