VadeLab
StatuteCompetition and Consumer Act 2010

Section 56EG — Competition and Consumer Act 2010: Privacy safeguard 4—dealing with unsolicited CDR data from participants in CDR

Text of the provision Official document

(1) A person must destroy CDR data as soon as practicable after collecting it if: (a) the person (the collector) collected the CDR data while covered by column 1 of an item of the following table, and from a person covered by column 2 of that item; and (b) the collector collected the CDR data: (i) purportedly under the consumer data rules; but (ii) not as the result of seeking to collect the CDR data under the consumer data rules; and (c) the collector is not required to retain the CDR data by or under an Australian law or a court/tribunal order; and (d) in the case where item 3 of the table applies, the circumstances specified in the consumer data rules do not apply. Dealing with unsolicited CDR data from participants in CDR Item Column 1 A collector who: Column 2 collects the CDR data from: 1 is an accredited person a CDR participant for the CDR data 2 as an accredited action initiator for a type of CDR action an action service provider for that type of CDR action 3 as an action service provider for a type of CDR action an accredited action initiator for that type of CDR action Note: This subsection is a civil penalty provision (see section 56EU). (2) Subsection (1) applies whether the collection is directly or indirectly from the person mentioned in column 2 of the table. Example: For item 1 of the table, the collection could be from the CDR participant through a designated gateway (see section 56BG).

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.