VadeLab
StatuteCorporations Act 2001

Section 1023T — Corporations Act 2001: Avoidance schemes—presumption of avoidance for certain schemes in civil cases

Text of the provision Official document

(1) For the purposes of subsection 1023S(1), (2), (3) or (4), it is reasonable to conclude, unless the contrary is proved, that a person entered into or carried out a scheme for the purpose of avoiding a credit product intervention order (within the meaning of subsection 1023S(11)) if: (a) the scheme is of a kind prescribed by the regulations; or (b) the scheme is of a kind determined by ASIC under subsection (3). (2) In proving the contrary for the purposes of subsection (1), regard must be had to any matters as required under subsection 1023S(8). (3) ASIC may, by legislative instrument, determine a scheme, or a class of schemes, for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b). (4) This section does not have effect for the purposes of determining whether a person has committed an offence against subsection 1023S(10).

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.