VadeLab
StatuteCorporations Act 2001

Section 1317DAD — Corporations Act 2001: Statement of reasons must be given

Text of the provision Official document

Statement of reasons (1) Before issuing the infringement notice, ASIC must: (a) give the disclosing entity a written statement that sets out ASIC’s reasons for believing that the disclosing entity has contravened subsection 674(2) or 675(2); and (b) give a representative of the disclosing entity an opportunity to: (i) appear at a private hearing before ASIC; and (ii) give evidence to ASIC; and (iii) make submissions to ASIC; in relation to the alleged contravention of subsection 674(2) or 675(2). (2) If the disclosing entity is a listed disclosing entity, ASIC must consult with the relevant market operator for the disclosing entity before giving the disclosing entity the statement under this subsection. (3) ASIC does not need to consult the relevant market operator under subsection (2) if: (a) the disclosing entity is the relevant market operator; or (b) the disclosing entity conducts a business in competition with a business conducted by the relevant market operator. Limit on the use of evidence or information given to ASIC (4) Evidence or information that a representative of the disclosing entity gives ASIC under paragraph (1)(b) in relation to the alleged contravention of subsection 674(2) or 675(2) is: (a) not admissible in evidence against the disclosing entity in any proceedings; and (b) not admissible in evidence against a representative of the disclosing entity in any proceedings (other than proceedings for an offence based on the evidence or information given being false or misleading).

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.