VadeLab
StatuteCorporations Act 2001

Section 332F — Corporations Act 2001: Exemption orders—criteria for orders

Text of the provision Official document

(1) To make an order under section 332D or 332E exempting a transparency reporting auditor, or class of transparency reporting auditors, from one or more requirements of sections 332A and 332B, ASIC must be satisfied that complying with the requirements would: (a) be inappropriate in the circumstances; or (b) impose unreasonable burdens. (2) In deciding for the purposes of subsection (1) whether complying with the requirements would impose an unreasonable burden on the auditor or class of auditors, ASIC is to have regard to: (a) the expected costs of complying with the requirements; and (b) the expected benefits of having the auditor or class of auditors comply with the requirements; and (c) any practical difficulties that the auditor or class of auditors faces in complying effectively with the requirements; and (d) any unusual aspects of the operations of the auditor or class of auditors; and (e) any other matters that ASIC considers relevant.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.