VadeLab
StatuteCorporations Act 2001

Section 852DT — Corporations Act 2001: Anti-avoidance

Text of the provision Official document

(1) If: (a) one or more persons enter into, begin to carry out or carry out a scheme; and (b) it would be concluded that the person, or any of the persons, who: (i) entered into; or (ii) began to carry out; or (iii) carried out; the scheme or any part of the scheme did so for the sole or dominant purpose of avoiding the application of any provision of Subdivision B in relation to any person or persons (whether or not mentioned in paragraph (a)); and (c) as a result of the scheme or a part of the scheme, a person (the controller) increases (including from a starting point of nil) the controller’s voting power in a controlled Australian financial body; ASIC may give the controller a written direction to cease having that voting power within a time specified in the direction. (2) A person who is subject to a written direction under subsection (1) must comply with the direction. Note: Failure to comply with this subsection is an offence: see subsection 1311(1).

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.