VadeLab
StatuteCrimes Act 1914

Section 15JR — Crimes Act 1914: Integrity testing operations—disclosure endangering safety etc.

Text of the provision Official document

Offence—disclosure endangering safety etc. (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person discloses information; and (b) the information relates to an integrity testing operation; and (c) either: (i) the person intends to endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation; or (ii) the disclosure of the information will endanger the health or safety of any person or prejudice the effective conduct of an integrity testing operation. Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years. Exceptions—authorised disclosure (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the disclosure was: (a) in connection with the administration or execution of this Part; or (b) for the purposes of obtaining legal advice in relation to the integrity testing operation; or (c) for the purposes of any disciplinary or legal action in relation to a staff member of a target agency, if arising out of, or otherwise related to, the integrity testing operation; or (d) in connection with the administration or execution of the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022; or (e) a disclosure to an authority of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory; or (f) in accordance with any requirement imposed by law; or (g) in connection with the performance of functions or duties, or the exercise of powers, of the target agency in relation to which the operation was conducted. Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in subsection (2)—see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code. Exception—corruption issue or misconduct (3) Subsection (1) does not apply if: (a) the person (the discloser) discloses the information to the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner; and (b) the discloser informs the person to whom the disclosure is made of the discloser’s identity before making the disclosure; and (c) the information concerns a corruption issue, or misconduct, in relation to an integrity testing operation; and (d) the discloser considers that the information may assist the National Anti-Corruption Commissioner to perform the Commissioner’s functions or duties; and (e) the discloser makes the disclosure in good faith. Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matters in subsection (3)—see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code. Exception—IGIS officials (4) Subsection (1) does not apply if the person discloses the information to an IGIS official for the purpose of the IGIS official exercising a power, or performing a function or duty, as an IGIS official. Note: A defendant, except for an IGIS official, bears an evidential burden in relation to a matter in this subsection (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code). For IGIS officials, see section 34C of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.