VadeLab
StatuteCrimes Act 1914

Section 3ZZGC — Crimes Act 1914: Power to obtain relevant information

Text of the provision Official document

(1) If the Ombudsman has reasonable grounds to believe that a staff member of an eligible agency is able to give information relevant to an inspection under this Division of the agency’s records, subsections (2) and (3) have effect. (2) The Ombudsman may, by writing given to the staff member, require the staff member to give the information to the Ombudsman: (a) by writing signed by the staff member; and (b) at a specified place and within a specified period. (3) The Ombudsman may, by writing given to the staff member, require the staff member to attend: (a) before a specified inspecting officer; and (b) at a specified place; and (c) within a specified period or at a specified time on a specified day; to answer questions relevant to the inspection. (4) If the Ombudsman: (a) has reasonable grounds to believe that a staff member of an eligible agency is able to give information relevant to an inspection under this Division of the agency’s records; and (b) does not know the staff member’s identity; the Ombudsman may, by writing given to the chief officer of the agency, require the chief officer, or a person nominated by the chief officer, to attend: (c) before a specified inspecting officer; and (d) at a specified place; and (e) within a specified period or at a specified time on a specified day; to answer questions relevant to the inspection. (5) The place, and the period or the time and day, specified in a requirement under this section, must be reasonable having regard to the circumstances in which the requirement is made.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.