VadeLab
StatuteFair Work Act 2009

Section 298 — Fair Work Act 2009: Special rule about retrospective variations of national minimum wage orders

Text of the provision Official document

Application of this section (1) This section applies if a determination varying a national minimum wage order has a retrospective effect because it comes into operation under subsection 297(2) on a day before the day on which the determination is made. No creation of liability to pay pecuniary penalty for past conduct (2) If: (a) a person engaged in conduct before the determination was made; and (b) but for the retrospective effect of the determination, the conduct would not have contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or an enterprise agreement; a court must not order the person to pay a pecuniary penalty under Division 2 of Part 4-1 in relation to the conduct, on the grounds that the conduct contravened a term of the national minimum wage order or enterprise agreement. Note 1: This subsection does not affect the powers of a court to make other kinds of orders under Division 2 of Part 4-1. Note 2: A determination varying a national minimum wage order could result in a contravention of a term of an enterprise agreement because of the effect of subsection 206(4).

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.