VadeLab
StatuteFair Work Act 2009

Section 412 — Fair Work Act 2009: Pattern bargaining

Text of the provision Official document

Pattern bargaining (1) A course of conduct by a person is pattern bargaining if: (a) the person is a bargaining representative for 2 or more proposed enterprise agreements; and (b) the course of conduct involves seeking common terms to be included in 2 or more of the agreements; and (c) the course of conduct relates to 2 or more employers. Exception—genuinely trying to reach an agreement (2) The course of conduct, to the extent that it relates to a particular employer, is not pattern bargaining if the bargaining representative is genuinely trying to reach an agreement with that employer. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), the factors relevant to working out whether a bargaining representative is genuinely trying to reach an agreement with a particular employer, include the following: (a) whether the bargaining representative is demonstrating a preparedness to bargain for the agreement taking into account the individual circumstances of that employer, including in relation to the nominal expiry date of the agreement; (b) whether the bargaining representative is bargaining in a manner consistent with the terms of the agreement being determined as far as possible by agreement between that employer and its employees; (c) whether the bargaining representative is meeting the good faith bargaining requirements. (4) If a person seeks to rely on subsection (2), the person has the burden of proving that the subsection applies. Genuinely trying to reach an agreement (5) This section does not affect, and is not affected by, the meaning of the expression “genuinely trying to reach an agreement”, or any variant of the expression, as used elsewhere in this Act.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.