VadeLab
StatuteFamily Law Act 1975

Section 70NAA — Family Law Act 1975: Simplified outline

Text of the provision Official document

This Division sets out orders that a court may make if an issue arises in the proceedings about whether a person (the respondent) has contravened a child-related order. The court may, at any stage of proceedings (and without having to make a finding about the contravention), make any of the following orders: (a) a make-up time parenting order; (b) an order varying or suspending a parenting order; (c) an order requiring the respondent and any other party to the proceedings to attend a post-separation parenting program. If the court finds on the balance of probabilities that the respondent contravened the child-related order without having a reasonable excuse, the court may make any of the following orders (having regard to the seriousness of the contravention): (a) an order requiring the respondent to enter into a bond; (b) an order imposing a fine on the respondent for failing to enter into a bond. If the court is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent contravened the child-related order without having a reasonable excuse, the court may also make any of the following orders (having regard to the seriousness of the contravention): (a) an order imposing a fine on the respondent; (b) an order imposing a sentence of imprisonment on the respondent. This Division also sets out ancillary matters relating to terms of imprisonment, the enforcement of bonds and other miscellaneous matters. Note: A court may also award costs against a party under section 117 if satisfied there are circumstances that justify it doing so.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.