VadeLab
StatuteFreedom of Information Act 1982

Section 56 — Freedom of Information Act 1982: Appeals—appeals to Federal Court of Australia on questions of law

Text of the provision Official document

(1) A review party may appeal to the Federal Court of Australia, on a question of law, from a decision of the Information Commissioner on an IC review. (2) An appeal under this section must be instituted: (a) either: (i) not later than 28 days after the day a decision under section 55K of the Information Commissioner on an IC review is given to the review party; or (ii) within the further time that the Federal Court of Australia allows; and (b) in any way that is prescribed by rules of court made under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976. (3) The Federal Court of Australia has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals instituted under this section. (4) The jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia under subsection (3) includes jurisdiction to make findings of fact under section 56A. (5) The Federal Court of Australia: (a) must hear and determine the appeal; and (b) may make any order or orders that it thinks appropriate by reason of its decision. (6) Without limiting subsection (5), the orders that the Federal Court of Australia may make include the following: (a) an order affirming the decision of the Information Commissioner; (b) an order setting aside the decision of the Information Commissioner and making a decision in substitution for the decision; (c) an order remitting the case to be considered and decided again by the Information Commissioner in accordance with the directions of the Court: (i) with or without the holding of a hearing; and (ii) with or without the hearing of further evidence.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.