VadeLab
StatuteMigration Act 1958

Section 357A — Migration Act 1958: Exhaustive statement of natural justice hearing rule

Text of the provision Official document

(1) The relevant provisions are taken to be an exhaustive statement of the requirements of the natural justice hearing rule in relation to the matters they deal with. (2A) If there is any inconsistency between the relevant provisions and any of the following provisions of the ART Act, the relevant provisions prevail to the extent of the inconsistency: (a) section 49 (Tribunal has discretion in relation to procedure); (b) section 50 (Tribunal is to act informally etc.); (c) section 53 (Tribunal controls scope of review of decision); (d) section 55 (right to present case). Note: The ART Act generally applies in relation to reviews by the ART (see subsection 336P(1)). (2B) Without limiting subsection (2A), paragraph 55(1)(b) of the ART Act does not apply in relation to a review of a reviewable migration decision or a reviewable protection decision. (2C) As an exhaustive statement of the requirements of the natural justice hearing rule, the relevant provisions do not require the ART to observe any principle or rule of common law relating to the matters the relevant provisions deal with. (2D) In this section, the relevant provisions are: (a) this Division; and (b) sections 374, 375, 375A and 376 and Division 7, in so far as they relate to this Division. (3) In applying this Division, the ART must act in a way that is fair and just.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.