VadeLab
StatuteMigration Act 1958

Section 36A — Migration Act 1958: Consideration of protection obligations

Text of the provision Official document

(1) In considering a valid application for a protection visa made by a non-citizen, the Minister must consider and make a record of whether the Minister is satisfied of any of the following: (a) the non-citizen satisfies the criterion in paragraph 36(2)(a) with respect to a country and also satisfies the criterion in subsection 36(1C); (b) the non-citizen satisfies the criterion in paragraph 36(2)(aa) with respect to a country; (c) the non-citizen: (i) satisfies the criterion in paragraph 36(2)(a) with respect to a country but does not satisfy the criterion in subsection 36(1C); and (ii) would satisfy the criterion in paragraph 36(2)(aa) with respect to a country except that the non-citizen is a non-citizen mentioned in paragraph 36(2)(a). (2) The Minister must do so: (a) before deciding whether to grant or refuse to grant the visa; and (b) before considering whether the non-citizen satisfies any other criteria for the grant of the visa; and (c) before considering whether the grant of the visa is prevented by any provision of the Act or regulations; and (d) without regard to subsections 36(2C) and (3). (3) Subsection (1) does not apply if: (a) the non-citizen (the family applicant) is a member of the same family unit as another non-citizen (the family visa holder) who holds a protection visa of the same class as the visa the family applicant is applying for; and (b) the family applicant’s application for a protection visa was made before the family visa holder was granted their visa; and (c) the family visa holder is a non-citizen mentioned in paragraph 36(2)(a) or (aa).

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.