VadeLab
StatuteMigration Act 1958

Section 76B — Migration Act 1958: Offence relating to monitoring conditions of certain bridging visas

Text of the provision Official document

(1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person holds a Subclass 070 (Bridging (Removal Pending)) visa; and (b) any of the following applies: (i) at the time the visa was granted, there was no real prospect of the removal of the person from Australia becoming practicable in the reasonably foreseeable future; (ii) the visa was granted under section 195A; (iii) if the non-citizen has previously held other Bridging R (Class WR) visas—the first of those visas was granted under section 195A; and (c) the visa is subject to a monitoring condition; and (d) the person fails to comply with a requirement of the monitoring condition. Note: Section 4K of the Crimes Act 1914, which deals with continuing and multiple offences, applies to this offence. Penalty: 5 years imprisonment or 300 penalty units, or both. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse. Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in this subsection (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code). (4) In this section: monitoring condition is a mandatory condition that: (a) requires the holder of a Subclass 070 (Bridging (Removal Pending)) visa to do any of the following things: (i) to notify the Minister or Department of specified matters within a specified period or before or by a specified day; (ii) to report at a specified time or times, and at a specified place or in a specified manner; (iii) to attend at a specified place, on a specified day and at a specified time; and (b) is not a prescribed condition.

Official source: Federal Register of Legislation

There are no decisions in our collection citing this provision yet. As new judgments are published, they will appear here.

Search case law on this topic

See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.

Explore case law →

Statutory text from an official public source. Informational content — does not replace advice from a qualified legal practitioner.