Section 215 — Paid Parental Leave Act 2010: Application of this Division
Text of the provision Official document
(1) This Division applies to the following decisions: (a) if a claimant decision has been affirmed under paragraph 203(4)(a) or subparagraph 205(1)(b)(i)—the claimant decision as affirmed; (b) if a claimant decision has been varied under paragraph 203(4)(b) or subparagraph 205(1)(b)(ii)—the claimant decision as varied; (c) if a claimant decision has been set aside under paragraph 203(4)(c) or subparagraph 205(1)(b)(iii) and substituted with a new decision—the new decision; (d) a claimant decision made personally by a PPL agency representative. (2) However, this Division does not apply to any of the following decisions: (a) a decision under one of the following provisions (which deal with the making of claims, the form and manner of claims, the form and manner of notices etc.): (i) subsection 18(4); (ii) paragraph 25(1)(c); (iii) subsections 53(2), (3) and (4); (iv) section 56; (v) subsection 61(2); (va) subsection 82(2A); (vi) paragraph 109(2)(a); (vii) subsection 110(1); (viii) paragraph 120(2)(a); (ix) subsection 125(4); (x) paragraph 286(2)(b); (xi) paragraph 288(2)(b); (xii) paragraph 289(2)(b); (xiii) subsection 289(5); (b) a decision under subsection 69(2) (which deals with deductions relating to child support); (c) a decision under Subdivision A of Division 2 of Part 4-1 (which deals with gathering information from any person); (d) a decision relating to the Secretary’s power under section 273A to settle proceedings before the ART; (e) a decision under the PPL rules, if the PPL rules state that this Division does not apply to the decision; (f) a decision under the regulations, if the regulations state that this Division does not apply to the decision. (3) A decision to which this Division applies is an ART reviewable claimant decision.
Official source: Federal Register of Legislation
Search case law on this topic
See judgments from Australian courts and tribunals with a plain-English summary and legal holding.
Explore case law →