
Tenancy & Housing judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Tenancy Tribunal ended the tenancy of a tenant because their rent was over 21 days late. The tenant had to pay back $3,877.00 to the landlord, which included the amount owed for rent arrears and the filing fee.
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant was responsible for the cracked oven hob and stained carpet, considering these damages exceeded normal wear and tear. The Tribunal awarded the landlord the cost of repairs minus the bond.
The Tenancy Tribunal at Hamilton ruled in favour of the claimant, ordering the respondent to pay $41,475.77, which includes unpaid levies, interest, legal costs, and the filing fee. The respondent argued that the levies were improperly raised and that the Extraordinary General Meeting was not conducted according to the Unit Titles Act 2010. However, the Tribunal rejected these arguments and upheld the claimant's claim.
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay $826.25 for unpaid rent and compensate the landlord for cleaning and weeding expenses after leaving the rental property without proper notice.
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed a tenant's request for a rehearing because the tenant did not provide enough proof that a serious mistake or injustice had occurred during the initial hearing.
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed a claim brought by a landlord against tenants because the landlord did not show up for the hearing. The Tribunal found that the rent was not overdue and that the tenants claimed they didn’t owe any water rates.
The Tenancy Tribunal terminated the tenancy of a tenant who abandoned the premises and failed to meet their obligations under the tenancy agreement. The decision was based on evidence of abandonment and breach of contract.
In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant is entitled to the full bond refund because the landlord failed to file a counterclaim as required by law. The ruling emphasises the importance of landlords adhering to legal procedures when disputing bond refunds.
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a tenant must leave the rental property in a reasonably clean and tidy condition and be responsible for any damage beyond fair wear and tear. In this case, the tenant was ordered to pay $7,870.12 to the landlord for leaving the property in poor condition and causing extensive damage.
The Tenancy Tribunal dismissed a tenant's application seeking compensation and eviction of a disruptive co-tenant. The Tribunal found that the landlord had taken reasonable steps to address the disruptive behavior, including issuing multiple breach notices.
The Tenancy Tribunal ended a tenancy because the tenant owed back rent and had damaged the windows. The Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay for the repairs since the landlord showed that the damage happened during the tenancy and was beyond normal wear and tear.