
Tenancy & Housing judgments from New Zealand courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $1,564.22 for cleaning, repairs, and other costs after the tenant left the premises unreasonably dirty and caused damage beyond fair wear and tear.
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay $1,341.29 in rent arrears to the landlord, as proven by the landlord's records. The bond was also transferred to the landlord. The tenant did not attend the hearing.
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $817.52 for rent arrears and damages beyond fair wear and tear. The tenant was found responsible for leaving the premises unclean and for causing damage to the property.
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the landlord must return the bond and pay rent arrears to the landlord, but dismissed the claim for lawn work compensation as the landlord did not provide sufficient evidence.
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled against the landlord's claims for cleaning and minor wall damage. The tenants were found not responsible for these issues as the landlord did not provide enough evidence to prove the claims.
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $2,159.25 for damages to the premises and unpaid rent. The Tribunal ruled that the tenant was responsible for damages beyond fair wear and tear.
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and compensate the landlord for replacing locks, but dismissed the claim for extra damages. The tenant left items in a storage locker, preventing vacant possession, but the Tribunal acknowledged an agreement with the landlord for removal after the tenancy end date.
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $29,937.19 for damages and non-compliance with end-of-tenancy obligations. The tenant left the premises unreasonably dirty and damaged, failed to remove rubbish, and did not return keys.
In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal dismissed one application because the landlord didn't show up for the hearing. However, they upheld a mediated order because both the landlord and tenant had previously agreed to it during a mediation session.