Conditional Termination Order with Tenant Identity Suppressed
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal granted a conditional termination order to a landlord, requiring the tenant to pay rent arrears over a period of time. The tenant's identity was suppressed from the published order to protect their privacy.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a conditional termination order if they demonstrate the ability to pay rent and arrears without committing further breaches.
📖 What the law says
This section states that the Tenancy Tribunal must end a tenancy if the rent is at least 21 days overdue when the landlord applies, or if the tenant has caused or threatened significant damage to the property, or has assaulted or threatened the landlord or related individuals.
This section explains that if a tenancy ends, the Tribunal must issue an order giving possession of the property back to the person who is entitled to it. It also clarifies that an order to end a tenancy automatically acts as an order for possession for the landlord.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
Conditional termination order granted with suppression of tenant's identity.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal granted a conditional termination order to a landlord, requiring the tenant to pay rent arrears over a period of time. The tenant's identity was suppressed from the published order.
📚 Full judgment Official document
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5127629 1
[2025] NZTT 5127629
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT [Event location suppressed]
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [Tenancy address suppressed]
ORDER
1. An application for suppression has been made in this case, and the Tribunal orders suppression of the tenant name and identifying details.
2. [The tenant/s] owes [COMPANY] $1,478.00 (“the debt”) being rent arrears to 10 March 2025.
3. [The tenant/s] must pay rent and the debt as follows:
a. By 24 weekly payments of $335.00, being $275.00 for rent and $60.00 for the debt.
b. A final payment of $313.00, being $275.00 for rent and $38.00 for the debt.
c. Payments will be every Friday, with the first payment on 07/03/2025 and continuing until 22/08/2025.
4. If the weekly rent amount changes, the $60.00 to be paid towards the debt will remain additional to the level of rent until the debt is paid in full.
5. Payments will be allocated in the following order: rent, then rent arrears.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5127629 2
6. If the tenant fails to pay rent and rent arrears within 2 working days of the due dates:
a. The tenancy at [Tenancy address suppressed] will terminate and the landlord will have immediate possession of the premises.
b. The balance of the debt will be payable immediately.
Reasons:
1. Both parties attended the hearing. [NAME] represented the landlord.
2. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy, rent arrears and refund of the bond. The tenant wants to repay the debt to avoid immediate termination.
Should a conditional termination order be made?
3. Where rent is at least 21 days in arrears on the date the application was filed, the Tribunal must make either a final or a conditional termination order. See section 55(1)(a) and (1A) Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA).
4. Having heard from the parties I am satisfied the tenant will pay the debt within the period specified in the order and is unlikely to commit any further relevant breach. Accordingly, by consent I have granted a conditional termination order.
5. The conditional termination order will lapse if it is fully complied with. If the tenant breaches the order, the possession order may be enforced for 90 days from the first breach. See section 64(4)(b) RTA.
6. As the tenant attended the hearing and consented to the order, it is appropriate pursuant to section 95A of the RTA that her details be suppressed from the published order.
[NAME] 07 March 2025
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5127629 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
Reasons:
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant was satisfied to be able to pay the debt within the specified period and avoid immediate termination.
- The tenant consented to the conditional termination order during the hearing.
- The tenant's identifying details were suppressed because she attended the hearing and consented to the order.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal granted a conditional termination order to the landlord, requiring the tenant to pay rent arrears over a period of time.
What was the dispute about?
The dispute was about the tenant owing rent arrears and the landlord seeking termination of the tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant a conditional termination order because the tenant demonstrated the ability to pay rent and arrears without committing further breaches.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 55(1)(a) and 64(4)(b) were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the tenant's ability to pay rent and arrears without committing further breaches.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also receive a conditional termination order if they can show the ability to pay rent and arrears without further breaches.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify the exact evidence or documents that mattered.