VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenancy Terminated Due to Rent Arrears

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal terminated the tenancy of a tenant due to rent arrears and breach of obligations. The landlord proved that rent was at least 21 days in arrears and the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant's tenancy can be terminated if rent is at least 21 days in arrears and there is a breach of obligations.

Topics

termination of tenancyrent arrears

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.55

This section allows the Tenancy Tribunal to end a tenancy if the rent is at least 21 days overdue when the landlord applies to the Tribunal. It also covers situations where the tenant has caused or threatened significant damage to the property, or has assaulted or threatened the landlord or their family/agent.

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.56

This section allows the Tenancy Tribunal to end a tenancy if one party has broken a rule in the tenancy agreement or the Act. If the problem can be fixed, the party who complained must have given the other party a notice to fix it within at least 10 working days, and the other party failed to do so.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The tenancy was terminated due to rent arrears and breach of obligations.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal terminated the tenancy of a tenant due to rent arrears and breach of obligations. The landlord proved that rent was at least 21 days in arrears and the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5223674 1

[2025] NZTT 5223674

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], Makarau, RD 1, Warkworth 0981

ORDER

1. The tenancy of [NAME] at [ADDRESS], Makarau, RD 1, Warkworth 0981 is terminated, and possession is granted to [COMPANY], from the end of Tuesday 27 May 2025.

2. The [COMPANY] is to pay the bond of $1,500.00 (6480676-005) to [COMPANY] immediately.

3. [NAME] must pay [COMPANY] $570.45 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Description Landlord Rent arrears to 19/04/2025 $1,964.29 Power charges to 9/01/2025 $79.16 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $2,070.45 Minus Bond $1,500.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $570.45

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5223674 2

Reasons:

1. Only the applicant landlord attended the hearing. The tenant was called on the number provided. The call appeared to be answered but no one spoke and the call was ended. The following call went to answerphone.

2. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations, rent and power arrears, refund of the bond and reimbursement of the filing fee.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

3. Where a landlord applies to terminate for breach, and rent is at least 21 days in arrears on the hearing date, the Tribunal must terminate the tenancy. See sections 55 and 56(2) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

4. Rent is at least 21 days in arrears at the hearing date. The tenancy is terminated.

How much does the tenant owe?

5. The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing to 19 April 2025 in the sum of $1964.29. The landlord advised that no further rent has been received. The amount is ordered as sought. The landlord advised that further rent arrears will be claimed in an application filed after the tenancy ends.

6. The landlord provided a power charges invoice sent to the tenant and due 9 January 2025 and seeks an order for payment of this. The amount is ordered as sought.

7. [COMPANY] has wholly succeeded with the claim I must reimburse the filing fee.

G Guptill

27 May 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5223674 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5223674 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Rent was at least 21 days in arrears.
  • The landlord provided proof of rent arrears.
  • The landlord provided proof of power charges arrears.
  • The landlord requested the bond be paid to them.
  • The landlord asked for reimbursement of the filing fee.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenancy was terminated due to rent arrears and breach of obligations.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether the tenant's tenancy should be terminated due to unpaid rent and failure to attend the hearing.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to terminate the tenancy because the rent was at least 21 days in arrears and the tenant breached their obligations.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 55 and 56(2) were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The most important argument was that the rent was at least 21 days in arrears and the tenant failed to attend the hearing.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they pay their rent on time and attend any hearings related to their tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The rent records and proof of arrears were the key pieces of evidence.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Termination of Tenancy Due to Rent Arrears - Tenancy | VadeLab