VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenancy Terminated for Abandonment and Rent Arrears - Tenancy Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ended a tenant's lease because the tenant abandoned the premises and was behind on rent payments. The decision was made through an expedited process under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant's tenancy can be terminated through the expedited process if the premises are abandoned and rent is in arrears.

Topics

AbandonmentRent Arrears

Provisions

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 61Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 91AA

📖 Technical summary

The tenancy was terminated due to abandonment and rent arrears.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal terminated the tenancy of a tenant due to abandonment and rent arrears, applying the expedited process under section 91AA of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5515554 1

[2026] NZTT 5515554

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT

APPLICANT: [redacted] [NAME_2]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: Unit/[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. The tenancy of [NAME_3] at Unit/[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] is terminated, and possession is granted to [COMPANY_1] As Agent For [NAME_2], immediately.

Reasons:

1. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for abandonment through the expedited process under section 91AA of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 (RTA).

Are there grounds for an expedited application?

2. I am satisfied that the two requirements for the expedited process are met:

a. The tenant does not want to contest the abandonment application; and

b. The information provided by the landlord with the application is sufficient to enable the Tribunal to determine it properly without a hearing (either on the basis of that information alone or with only minor clarifications).

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5515554 2

Should the tenancy be terminated?

3. The Tribunal may terminate the tenancy where the premises have been abandoned and rent is in arrears at the hearing date. (See section 61 of the RTA.) A tenancy is abandoned where the tenant leaves the premises without reasonable excuse, not intending to return or to meet their obligations, and fails to notify the landlord.

4. On 19 May 2026, the landlord became aware (or ought to have been aware) that the tenant had abandoned the premises. This was the date that the landlord inspected the premises and noticed that the tenant had vacated the premises. The landlord has provided photographs of that inspection which show that it is more likely than not that the tenant has vacated the premises.

5. The landlord has also provided rent records which show the tenant is in rent arrears.

6. As the premises have been abandoned, and rent is in arrears, I am terminating the tenancy immediately.

7. All the requirements for an expedited abandonment application have been met. If the landlord has further claims against the tenant, the landlord will need to file a new application with the Tribunal and pay the applicable fee.

K Henry

02 June 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5515554 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit [NAME_4]/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi [NAME_4]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.[NAME_4]/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.[NAME_4]/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.[NAME_4]/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5515554 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: [NAME_4]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal decided to terminate the tenant's tenancy due to abandonment and rent arrears.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether the tenant had abandoned the premises and was in rent arrears.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to terminate the tenancy because the premises were abandoned and rent was in arrears, meeting the criteria for the expedited process.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, sections 61 and 91AA, were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the tenant had abandoned the premises and was in rent arrears, allowing the expedited process to be used.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation could have their tenancy terminated if they abandon the premises and are in rent arrears.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the inspection showing the premises were abandoned and rent records showing arrears were important evidence.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.