VadeLab
DismissedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenancy Terminated for Persistent Rent Arrears

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tenancy Tribunal ended the tenancy of a tenant due to repeated failures to pay rent on time. The tenant had a history of rent arrears and did not remedy the breaches within the required timeframe.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant must remedy rent arrears within 14 days or face termination of the tenancy.

Topics

rent arrearstermination of tenancy

Provisions

📖 Technical summary

The Tenancy Tribunal terminated the tenancy due to ongoing rent arrears.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal terminated the tenancy of the tenant due to persistent rent arrears and failure to remedy breaches within 14 days, as per the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

📚 Full judgment Official document

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5167945 1

[2025] NZTT 5167945

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. The tenancy of [NAME] at [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] is terminated, and possession is granted to [COMPANY]- [NAME], at midnight on Sunday 11 May 2025 subject to the following:

a. The tenant is to pay current weekly rent of $600.00 for the remaining period of the tenancy on time.

b. If the tenant fails to pay rent when it falls due the tenancy at [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] will terminate and the landlord will have immediate possession of the premises.

2. [NAME] must pay [COMPANY]- [NAME] $948.43 immediately, calculated as shown in the table below:

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 14/04/2025 $921.43 Filing fee reimbursement $27.00 Total award $948.43 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $948.43

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5167945 2

Reasons:

1. Both parties attended the hearing which was held by teleconference.

2. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for breach of the tenant’s obligations.

Should the tenancy be terminated?

3. The Tribunal may terminate a tenancy for breach where, due to the nature or extent of the breach, it would be inequitable to refuse to terminate. See section 56(1) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

4. Where the breach is capable of remedy the landlord must first serve a notice on the tenant requiring them to remedy the breach within at least 14 days and establish that the tenant has failed to do so.

5. The tenant has breached their obligations by failing to pay rent when it fell due.

6. The landlord served a 14-day notice on the tenant on 1 November 2024, and the tenant did not remedy the breach within the required period.

7. It would be inequitable to refuse to terminate the tenancy because:

• As at the date of the hearing, the rent arrears remain unpaid in the sum of $921.43.

• The landlord submitted a full rent summary in support of the claim and confirmed that the tenant has a history of rent arrears. Evidence was provided that a previous application to the Tribunal (Application 4780219) resulted in a termination order being granted. However, on that occasion the tenant paid the debt in full, and the landlord agreed to allow the tenant to remain in the property.

• Since then, the landlord has issued further breach notices for unpaid rent, none of which have been remedied within the required timeframe. The landlord advised that there has been a continued pattern of arrears throughout the tenancy, and while there had been previous efforts at resolution through mediation and Tribunal processes, the situation has not improved.

8. As such, the statutory grounds for termination have been met.

9. Although the tenant expressed a wish to remain in the tenancy and acknowledged the landlord’s position, she did not present any concrete proposal or evidence that would enable the Tribunal to conclude the situation will improve or that a further breach would not recur. The landlord, in turn, has offered a generous extension of time, allowing the tenant to remain until

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5167945 3

midnight on Sunday 11 May 2025, provided rent is paid in full and on time during this period.

10. The Tribunal acknowledges that termination of a tenancy can create hardship for tenants, particularly where alternative housing arrangements are not yet been secured. The tenant is encouraged to seek assistance from the Ministry of Social Development (MSD), which may be able to help with emergency housing, transitional accommodation, or financial support. The tenant can contact Work and Income on [PHONE] or visit their local office. Additional advice and support can also be obtained through the Citizens Advice Bureau ([PHONE]) or Community Law Centres, which can assist with housing and legal matters.

11. As the landlord has been wholly successful in the application, I must order the tenant to reimburse the filing fee.

[NAME]

14 April 2025

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5167945 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order for the payment of less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work worth less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5167945 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant failed to pay rent when it was due.
  • The landlord provided evidence of a history of rent arrears.
  • The landlord offered the tenant a chance to remain in the property if rent was paid in full and on time.
  • The tenant did not provide any concrete proposal to show the situation would improve.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant expressed a wish to remain in the tenancy but did not offer a solution to avoid future breaches.
  • The tenant did not present any evidence to suggest they could consistently pay rent in the future.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal terminated the tenancy of the tenant due to persistent rent arrears.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether the tenant's persistent rent arrears justified terminating the tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to terminate the tenancy because the tenant failed to remedy the rent arrears within the required 14-day period.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancies Act 1986, specifically section 54, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The most critical argument was that the tenant had a history of rent arrears and failed to remedy breaches within the required timeframe.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant who brought the case, as the tenancy was terminated.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they remedy any breaches within the required timeframe to avoid termination of their tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the tenant's history of rent arrears and previous breach notices was crucial.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Termination of Tenancy Due to Rent Arrears - Tenancy | VadeLab